Suppr超能文献

使用临时或持续环孢素A免疫抑制的同种异体神经移植再生比较。

Comparison of regeneration across nerve allografts with temporary or continuous cyclosporin A immunosuppression.

作者信息

Midha R, Mackinnon S E, Evans P J, Best T J, Hare G M, Hunter D A, Falk-Wade J A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 1993 Jan;78(1):90-100. doi: 10.3171/jns.1993.78.1.0090.

Abstract

The efficacy of short-term immunosuppression in a nerve allograft model was examined by comparing regeneration across peripheral nerve allografts with either temporary (12 weeks) or continuous (30 weeks) cyclosporin A treatment. One-hundred fifty Lewis rats received 2-cm nerve grafts from allogeneic ACI or syngeneic Lewis rat donors and were allocated to the following groups: allogeneic grafts and continuous cyclosporin A, with 18 weeks (20 rats) or 30 weeks (20 rats) of survival after graft placement; allogeneic grafts and temporary cyclosporin A, with 12 weeks (10 rats), 18 weeks (20 rats), or 30 weeks (20 rats) of survival; and control rats with allogeneic and syngeneic grafts, no cyclosporin A, with 12, 18, or 30 weeks (10 rats each) of survival. Functional regeneration across the nerve grafts was serially assessed with walking-track analysis. Endpoint evaluations included electrophysiological, histological, and morphometric studies. Both walking-track and electrophysiological function reached a plateau at a significantly worse level in nonimmunosuppressed allograft recipients than in syngeneic or treated allograft recipients. The group with temporary therapy experienced significant worsening in both motor and electrophysiological function at Week 18, 6 weeks after cyclosporin A withdrawal, compared to the group with continuous treatment. At Week 30, motor and electrophysiological function in the temporary-treatment group recovered to levels similar to those of the syngeneic and continuous cyclosporin A groups. Histological assessment of the graft segments from the temporary cyclosporin A group at 18 weeks showed evidence of rejection, with mononuclear cell infiltration and demyelination; morphometric evaluation demonstrated significantly decreased numbers of nerve fibers in the distal host segment. These histological and morphometric changes were no longer present in the nerves from the temporarily immunosuppressed rats at Week 30. Withdrawal of immunosuppression after successful regeneration through nerve allografts results in short-term graft rejection. Eventual restoration of graft histological and function parameters is comparable to continuously immunosuppressed rats. Temporary immunosuppression of nerve allograft recipients is feasible.

摘要

通过比较接受临时(12周)或持续(30周)环孢素A治疗的外周神经同种异体移植的神经再生情况,研究了短期免疫抑制在神经同种异体移植模型中的疗效。150只Lewis大鼠接受了来自同种异体ACI或同基因Lewis大鼠供体的2厘米神经移植,并被分配到以下组:同种异体移植和持续环孢素A组,移植后存活18周(20只大鼠)或30周(20只大鼠);同种异体移植和临时环孢素A组,存活12周(10只大鼠)、18周(20只大鼠)或30周(20只大鼠);以及接受同种异体和同基因移植、未使用环孢素A的对照大鼠,存活12、18或30周(每组10只大鼠)。通过行走轨迹分析对神经移植的功能再生进行连续评估。终点评估包括电生理、组织学和形态学研究。与同基因或接受治疗的同种异体移植受体相比,未接受免疫抑制的同种异体移植受体的行走轨迹和电生理功能在明显更差的水平达到平台期。与持续治疗组相比,临时治疗组在环孢素A停药6周后的第18周,运动和电生理功能均出现明显恶化。在第30周时,临时治疗组的运动和电生理功能恢复到与同基因和持续使用环孢素A组相似的水平。对临时环孢素A组18周时移植段的组织学评估显示有排斥反应的迹象,有单核细胞浸润和脱髓鞘;形态学评估表明远端宿主段神经纤维数量明显减少。在第30周时,临时免疫抑制大鼠的神经中不再出现这些组织学和形态学变化。通过神经同种异体移植成功再生后停用免疫抑制会导致短期移植排斥。移植组织学和功能参数最终恢复与持续免疫抑制的大鼠相当。对神经同种异体移植受体进行临时免疫抑制是可行的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验