• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

幼儿骨骼年龄测定:手部/腕部X光片三个区域的分析

Skeletal age determination in young children: analysis of three regions of the hand/wrist film.

作者信息

Carpenter C T, Lester E L

机构信息

Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington.

出版信息

J Pediatr Orthop. 1993 Jan-Feb;13(1):76-9. doi: 10.1097/01241398-199301000-00015.

DOI:10.1097/01241398-199301000-00015
PMID:8416359
Abstract

The determination of skeletal age in young children is useful in predicting eventual leg length discrepancies, but underreading of skeletal age may result in predicting the ultimate leg length to be much longer than it actually will be, with a correspondingly larger discrepancy as well. We evaluated 100 hand/wrist radiographs of 45 children aged between 14 months and 9.8 years. Separate readings were taken of the distal radius and ulna, the carpal bones, and the metacarpals and phalanges. The discrepancy between bone ages and chronologic age was significantly different between regions of the hand and between sexes. When determining bone age in children under age 10 years, care should be taken to consider the entire hand, perhaps with less emphasis on the carpal bones.

摘要

幼儿骨骼年龄的测定有助于预测最终的腿长差异,但骨骼年龄判读不足可能会导致预测的最终腿长比实际腿长长得多,相应地差异也会更大。我们评估了45名年龄在14个月至9.8岁之间儿童的100张手部/腕部X光片。分别对桡骨远端和尺骨远端、腕骨以及掌骨和指骨进行判读。手部不同区域以及不同性别之间,骨龄与实际年龄的差异显著不同。在确定10岁以下儿童的骨龄时,应注意考虑整个手部,或许可减少对腕骨的重视。

相似文献

1
Skeletal age determination in young children: analysis of three regions of the hand/wrist film.幼儿骨骼年龄测定:手部/腕部X光片三个区域的分析
J Pediatr Orthop. 1993 Jan-Feb;13(1):76-9. doi: 10.1097/01241398-199301000-00015.
2
Maturation Disparity between Hand-Wrist Bones in a Chinese Sample of Normal Children: An Analysis Based on Automatic BoneXpert and Manual Greulich and Pyle Atlas Assessment.中国正常儿童样本中手-腕骨成熟度差异:基于自动骨龄仪和手动格雷利希和派尔图谱评估的分析
Korean J Radiol. 2016 May-Jun;17(3):435-42. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.3.435. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
3
Segmenting radiographs of the hand and wrist.对手部和腕部X光片进行分割。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1994 Jun;43(3-4):227-37. doi: 10.1016/0169-2607(94)90074-4.
4
Skeletal maturation of wrist and hand ossification centers in normal Spanish boys and girls: a study using the Greulich-Pyle method.西班牙正常男孩和女孩手腕及手部骨化中心的骨骼成熟度:一项使用格-派方法的研究
Acta Anat (Basel). 1996;155(3):206-11. doi: 10.1159/000147806.
5
Skeletal development of Finnish children in the light of hand-wrist roentgenograms.
Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1973 Oct;69(5):182-90.
6
Skeletal age assessment in children and young adults: comparison between a newly developed sonographic method and conventional methods.儿童和青少年的骨骼年龄评估:一种新开发的超声方法与传统方法的比较。
Skeletal Radiol. 1998 May;27(5):271-7. doi: 10.1007/s002560050380.
7
Maturation disparity between hand-wrist bones in Hong Kong Chinese children.中国香港儿童手腕骨成熟度差异
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1971 May;34(3):385-95. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330340308.
8
Bone-specific median age of hand-wrist maturation from Sudan.来自苏丹的手部-腕部成熟的骨骼特异性中位年龄。
Ann Hum Biol. 2023 Feb;50(1):1-7. doi: 10.1080/03014460.2022.2157484.
9
Skeletal age estimation in leg length discrepancy.
J Pediatr Orthop. 1988 Sep-Oct;8(5):513-5. doi: 10.1097/01241398-198809000-00002.
10
Evaluating the agreement of skeletal age assessment based on hand-wrist and cervical vertebrae radiography.评估基于手-腕和颈椎射线摄影的骨骼年龄评估的一致性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Dec;144(6):838-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.07.015.

引用本文的文献

1
Standardization of Weightage Assigned to Different Segments of the Hand X-ray for Assessment of Bone Age by the Greulich-Pyle Method.通过格鲁利希-派尔方法评估骨龄时手部X线不同部位权重分配的标准化
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Mar-Apr;28(2):160-166. doi: 10.4103/ijem.ijem_237_23. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
2
Bone age assessment based on three-dimensional ultrasound and artificial intelligence compared with paediatrician-read radiographic bone age: protocol for a prospective, diagnostic accuracy study.基于三维超声和人工智能的骨龄评估与儿科医生阅片评估骨龄的比较:一项前瞻性、诊断准确性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 24;14(2):e079969. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079969.
3
Development of a simplified new method of bone age estimation using three bones of the hand and wrist.
发展一种使用手部和腕部的 3 块骨头来简化骨龄评估的新方法。
Endocrine. 2024 Jun;84(3):1135-1145. doi: 10.1007/s12020-024-03684-9. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
4
Ultrasonography in determining pubertal growth and bone age.超声检查在判断青春期生长和骨龄中的应用。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018 Oct;47(7):20170398. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20170398. Epub 2018 May 2.
5
Maturation Disparity between Hand-Wrist Bones in a Chinese Sample of Normal Children: An Analysis Based on Automatic BoneXpert and Manual Greulich and Pyle Atlas Assessment.中国正常儿童样本中手-腕骨成熟度差异:基于自动骨龄仪和手动格雷利希和派尔图谱评估的分析
Korean J Radiol. 2016 May-Jun;17(3):435-42. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.3.435. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
6
The utility of ultrasonographic bone age determination in detecting growth disturbances; a comparative study with the conventional radiographic technique.超声骨龄测定在检测生长障碍中的应用;与传统放射学技术的比较研究。
Skeletal Radiol. 2015 Sep;44(9):1351-6. doi: 10.1007/s00256-015-2175-8. Epub 2015 May 31.
7
Bone age assessment with conventional ultrasonography in healthy infants from 1 to 24 months of age.对1至24个月大健康婴儿进行传统超声骨龄评估。
Pediatr Radiol. 2015 Jul;45(7):1007-15. doi: 10.1007/s00247-014-3253-0. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
8
Skeletal age in idiopathic short stature: An analytical study by the TW3 method, Greulich and Pyle method.特发性矮小症的骨骼年龄:采用TW3法和格-派法的分析研究
Indian J Orthop. 2010 Jul;44(3):322-6. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.65144.
9
Pearls and pitfalls of deformity correction and limb lengthening via monolateral external fixation.单侧外固定架矫正畸形与肢体延长的要点与陷阱
Iowa Orthop J. 1996;16:58-69.
10
Computer-aided estimation of skeletal age and comparison with bone age evaluations by the method of Greulich-Pyle and Tanner-Whitehouse.计算机辅助骨骼年龄估计以及与格雷厄姆 - 派尔法和坦纳 - 怀特豪斯法的骨龄评估结果比较。
Pediatr Radiol. 1996;26(3):226-31. doi: 10.1007/BF01405306.