Enright P L, Kronmal R A, Higgins M, Schenker M, Haponik E F
Cardiovascular Health Study Center, Seattle, Washington 98105.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Jan;147(1):125-33. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.1.125.
Pulmonary function was assessed by spirometry in 5,201 ambulatory elderly participants of the Cardiovascular Health Study, sampled from four communities. A stringent quality assurance program exceeded American Thoracic Society (ATS) recommendations for spirometry. Less than 6% of the participants were unable to perform three acceptable spirometry maneuvers. A "healthy" subgroup of 777 women and men 65 to 85 yr of age was identified by excluding smokers and those with lung disease and other factors determined to independently, significantly, and negatively influence the FEV1. Results from black participants were examined separately. Reference equations and normal ranges for FEV1, FVC, and the FEV1/FVC ratio were determined from the healthy group. The results demonstrate differences in predicted values as great as 20% (0.5 to 1 L) for elderly patients when compared with the spirometry reference equations that are most commonly used in the United States.
在心血管健康研究的5201名社区老年门诊参与者中,通过肺活量测定法评估肺功能,这些参与者来自四个社区。一个严格的质量保证计划超出了美国胸科学会(ATS)对肺活量测定的建议。不到6%的参与者无法完成三次可接受的肺活量测定动作。通过排除吸烟者以及患有肺部疾病和其他被确定会独立、显著且负面地影响第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)的因素,确定了一个由777名年龄在65至85岁之间的男性和女性组成的“健康”亚组。对黑人参与者的结果进行了单独检查。从健康组确定了FEV1、用力肺活量(FVC)和FEV1/FVC比值的参考方程和正常范围。结果表明,与美国最常用的肺活量测定参考方程相比,老年患者的预测值差异高达20%(0.5至1升)。