Brückner V, Noster U, Schulz K H, Stute J
Z Hautkr. 1977 Feb 15;52(4):109-16.
Immediate-type reactions such as asthma, pollinosis and several forms of urticaria can be regarded as type I reactions according to Coombs and Gell. Primary these diseases are caused by the immune globulin E. As skin testing is accompanied by numerous failors, there is a real possibility in increasing the diagnostic relevance by measurement of the specific IgE in serum (Radio-Allergo-Sorbens-Test = RAST; Phadebas-RAST -- Pharmacia Uppsala). There are often found divergent results and therefore this investigation was started. 1357 RAST-results (530 patients) were compared with skin tests in order to investigate the concordance of the two test-methods. The statistical analysis is performed wit "4-square-Chi2". Very good correspondence could be calculated for the pollens of Festuca elatior, Poa pratensis, horse-epithelium and housedustmite (1 0/00O significancy). 1 0/0 significancy was found for catepithelium and 5 0/0 for Birch-pollen. The advantages and the disadventages of RAST are discussed.
根据库姆斯和盖尔的分类,诸如哮喘、花粉症和几种形式的荨麻疹等速发型反应可被视为I型反应。这些疾病主要由免疫球蛋白E引起。由于皮肤试验存在诸多失败情况,通过检测血清中的特异性IgE(放射变应原吸附试验=RAST;法德巴斯RAST——乌普萨拉法玛西亚公司产品)来提高诊断相关性具有切实可能性。经常会出现不同的结果,因此开展了此项研究。为了研究两种检测方法的一致性,将1357例RAST结果(530名患者)与皮肤试验进行了比较。采用“四格卡方检验”进行统计分析。对于高羊茅、草地早熟禾、马上皮和屋尘螨的花粉,计算得出二者具有很好的一致性(显著性为1‰)。对于猫上皮,显著性为1%,对于桦树花粉,显著性为5%。文中讨论了RAST的优缺点。