• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

浅表性膀胱癌的随访效率能提高吗?

Can efficiency of follow-up for superficial bladder cancer be increased?

作者信息

Gulliford M C, Petruckevitch A, Burney P G

机构信息

Department of Public Health Medicine, United Medical School, Guy's Hospital, London.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993 Jan;75(1):57-61.

PMID:8422147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2497742/
Abstract

This study evaluated the efficiency with which follow-up cystoscopy was employed in a population-based cohort of patients with superficial bladder cancer. Subjects were 240 men, aged under 75 years, with superficial bladder cancer first diagnosed in 1982. The median duration of follow-up was 6.1 years. The median (interquartile range) number of follow-up cystoscopies was 8 (5-12) per patient with a patient-specific annual rate of 1.7 (1.2-2.2) per year. The median number of cystoscopies at which recurrent tumour was detected was 2 (0-5) per patient, patient-specific annual rate 0.4 (0.0-1.3) per year of follow-up. Among patients with a single tumour at diagnosis and a negative first check cystoscopy (MRC group 1), the proportion of positive cystoscopies was 0.1 (0.0-0.4). Comparison of observed intervals between cystoscopies with optimal intervals calculated using an optimisation model showed that patients in MRC group 1 were seen sooner in practice than the model predicted, while in practice other patients were seen later than the model predicted. These data support the suggestion that efficiency of follow-up for patients with superficial bladder cancer could be increased by dividing patients into groups with different risks of recurrence and differing follow-up requirements.

摘要

本研究评估了在一个基于人群的浅表性膀胱癌患者队列中采用随访膀胱镜检查的效率。研究对象为240名年龄在75岁以下、于1982年首次被诊断为浅表性膀胱癌的男性患者。随访的中位时长为6.1年。每位患者随访膀胱镜检查的中位(四分位间距)次数为8次(5 - 12次),患者个体的年检查率为每年1.7次(1.2 - 2.2次)。检测到复发性肿瘤时膀胱镜检查的中位次数为每位患者2次(0 - 5次),患者个体每年随访的检查率为0.4次(0.0 - 1.3次)。在诊断时为单一肿瘤且首次膀胱镜检查结果为阴性的患者(MRC第1组)中,膀胱镜检查呈阳性的比例为0.1(0.0 - 0.4)。将实际膀胱镜检查间隔时间与使用优化模型计算出的最佳间隔时间进行比较,结果显示,MRC第1组患者在实际中接受检查的时间比模型预测的要早,而其他患者在实际中接受检查的时间比模型预测的要晚。这些数据支持了以下建议,即通过将患者分为复发风险不同且随访要求各异的组,可以提高浅表性膀胱癌患者随访的效率。

相似文献

1
Can efficiency of follow-up for superficial bladder cancer be increased?浅表性膀胱癌的随访效率能提高吗?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993 Jan;75(1):57-61.
2
Evaluation of nonlinear optimization for scheduling of follow-up cystoscopies to detect recurrent bladder cancer. The Bladder Cancer follow-up Group.
Med Decis Making. 1991 Oct-Dec;11(4):240-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9101100402.
3
Superficial bladder cancer: timing of check cystoscopies in the first year.浅表性膀胱癌:第一年膀胱镜检查的时间安排
Br J Urol. 1993 Oct;72(4):446-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1993.tb16174.x.
4
Ta T1 low and intermediate transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: recurrence rates and the timing of check cystoscopies within the first year.膀胱Ta T1期低级别和中级别的移行细胞癌:复发率及第一年膀胱镜检查的时间安排
Urol Int. 2008;80(2):124-8. doi: 10.1159/000112600. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
5
uCyt+ test: alternative to cystoscopy for less-invasive follow-up of patients with low risk of urothelial carcinoma.尿细胞阳性(uCyt+)检测:用于低风险尿路上皮癌患者微创随访的膀胱镜检查替代方法。
Urology. 2006 May;67(5):950-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.11.057.
6
Routine follow-up cystoscopy in detection of recurrence in patients being monitored for bladder cancer.在膀胱癌监测患者中,采用常规随访膀胱镜检查来检测复发情况。
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 2001;90(4):261-5.
7
[Modern follow-up strategies for the treatment of patients with superficial bladder carcinoma].[浅表性膀胱癌患者治疗的现代随访策略]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2000 Aug;94(6):519-27.
8
An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer.评估 Cxbladder Monitor 检测在膀胱癌患者治疗后的随访中的实际应用和临床实用性。
BMC Urol. 2020 Feb 11;20(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-0583-0.
9
Follow-up of superficial bladder cancer: how to spare cystoscopies?浅表性膀胱癌的随访:如何减少膀胱镜检查次数?
Eur Urol. 1990;17(1):17-9. doi: 10.1159/000463991.
10
The impact of regular biopsy in the first cystoscopic follow-up and other predictors on the recurrence of superficial bladder tumors.首次膀胱镜随访时定期活检及其他预测因素对浅表性膀胱肿瘤复发的影响。
Chang Gung Med J. 2010 Mar-Apr;33(2):174-87.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer follow up: time for review.癌症随访:复查时间
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985 Oct;35(279):492.
2
The analysis of results in prophylactic superficial bladder cancer studies.预防性浅表性膀胱癌研究结果分析
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1985;185B:3-11.
3
Value of routine follow up of women treated for early carcinoma of the breast.早期乳腺癌治疗后女性常规随访的价值
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Nov 23;291(6507):1464-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6507.1464.
4
Prognostic factors in infiltrating bladder cancer.浸润性膀胱癌的预后因素
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1986;221:271-86.
5
The impact of guidelines in clinical outpatient practice.指南对临床门诊实践的影响。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1988 Oct;22(4):244-7.
6
Efficient scheduling of cystoscopies in monitoring for recurrent bladder cancer.复发性膀胱癌监测中膀胱镜检查的高效安排
Med Decis Making. 1989 Jan-Mar;9(1):26-37. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8900900105.
7
Prognostic factors for recurrence and followup policies in the treatment of superficial bladder cancer: report from the British Medical Research Council Subgroup on Superficial Bladder Cancer (Urological Cancer Working Party).浅表性膀胱癌治疗中复发的预后因素及随访策略:英国医学研究理事会浅表性膀胱癌小组(泌尿外科癌症工作组)报告
J Urol. 1989 Aug;142(2 Pt 1):284-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38731-1.
8
Management importance of common treatments: contribution of top 20 procedures to surgical workload and cost.常见治疗方法的管理重要性:前20种手术操作对手术工作量和成本的贡献。
BMJ. 1991 Apr 13;302(6781):882-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6781.882.
9
Survival with bladder cancer, evaluation of delay in treatment, type of surgeon, and modality of treatment.膀胱癌患者的生存率、治疗延迟评估、外科医生类型及治疗方式。
BMJ. 1991 Aug 24;303(6800):437-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6800.437.