Drummond M, Brandt A, Luce B, Rovira J
University of York.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1993 Winter;9(1):26-36. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300003007.
There has been an exponential growth in the literature on economic evaluation in health care. As the range and quality of analytical work has improved, economic studies are becoming more influential with health care decision makers. The development of standards for economic evaluation methods would help maintain the scientific quality of studies, facilitate the comparison of economic evaluation results for different health care interventions, and assist in the interpretation of results from setting to setting. However, standardization might unnecessarily stifle methodological developments. This paper reviews the arguments for and against standardization, assesses attempts to date, outlines the main areas of agreement and disagreement on methods for economic evaluation, and makes recommendations for further work.
关于医疗保健经济评估的文献呈指数级增长。随着分析工作的范围和质量不断提高,经济研究对医疗保健决策者的影响力越来越大。制定经济评估方法标准将有助于保持研究的科学质量,便于比较不同医疗保健干预措施的经济评估结果,并有助于在不同环境下解读结果。然而,标准化可能会不必要地抑制方法学的发展。本文回顾了支持和反对标准化的观点,评估了迄今为止的尝试,概述了在经济评估方法上的主要共识和分歧领域,并对进一步的工作提出了建议。