• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药品、专利与政治:加拿大与第C-22号法案

Pharmaceuticals, patents, and politics: Canada and Bill C-22.

作者信息

Lexchin J

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 1993;23(1):147-60. doi: 10.2190/UCWG-YBR3-X3L0-NWYT.

DOI:10.2190/UCWG-YBR3-X3L0-NWYT
PMID:8425783
Abstract

In response to high drug prices, the Canadian government amended the country's patent act in 1969 to allow for compulsory licensing to import pharmaceuticals. As a result of the legislation, by 1983 drug costs in Canada were over $200 million lower than they would otherwise have been. The multinational drug industry was strongly opposed to compulsory licensing, despite any evidence that its economic position had been harmed. Restoration of patent protection for drugs was one of the key U.S. demands during free-trade negotiations between Canada and the United States in 1985-1987. The result was Bill C-22, which gave new drugs protection from compulsory licensing for seven to ten years. This article analyzes the impact of Bill C-22 on the generic industry, the creation of jobs in research and development, drug prices, and research and development expenditures. It concludes with an examination of future demands from the pharmaceutical industry.

摘要

为应对高昂的药品价格,加拿大政府于1969年修订了该国的专利法,允许强制许可进口药品。这项立法实施后,到1983年,加拿大的药品成本比原本应有的成本降低了2亿多美元。尽管没有任何证据表明其经济地位受到了损害,但跨国制药行业强烈反对强制许可。恢复药品专利保护是1985年至1987年加拿大与美国自由贸易谈判期间美国的关键要求之一。结果就是出台了C-22法案,该法案给予新药7至10年的强制许可保护。本文分析了C-22法案对仿制药行业、研发领域就业创造、药品价格以及研发支出的影响。文章最后审视了制药行业未来的需求。

相似文献

1
Pharmaceuticals, patents, and politics: Canada and Bill C-22.药品、专利与政治:加拿大与第C-22号法案
Int J Health Serv. 1993;23(1):147-60. doi: 10.2190/UCWG-YBR3-X3L0-NWYT.
2
Intellectual property rights and the Canadian pharmaceutical marketplace: where do we go from here?知识产权与加拿大药品市场:我们将何去何从?
Int J Health Serv. 2005;35(2):237-56. doi: 10.2190/Y8UR-YWVR-BUDP-CDR0.
3
Relationships between the academic community and the pharmaceutical industry: the legislative background and its effect on spending on medical research and development.学术界与制药行业之间的关系:立法背景及其对医学研发支出的影响。
Clin Invest Med. 1996 Dec;19(6):470-8.
4
Patents, pills and politics: the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.专利、药品与政治:《澳美自由贸易协定》与药品福利计划
Aust Health Rev. 2004 Nov 8;28(2):218-26. doi: 10.1071/ah040218.
5
The North American Free Trade Agreement's effect on pharmaceutical patents: a bitter pill to swallow or a therapeutic solution?《北美自由贸易协定》对药品专利的影响:是难以下咽的苦药还是治疗良方?
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1996 Spring;12(2):607-36.
6
Sublicense or supply agreement? Supreme Court of Canada interpretation benefits generic pharmaceutical industry.分许可协议还是供应协议?加拿大最高法院的解释有利于仿制药行业。
Food Drug Law J. 1999;54(1):73-91.
7
The ongoing regulation of generic drugs.仿制药的持续监管。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 15;357(20):1993-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp078193.
8
Compulsory licensing to regulated licensing: effects on the conflict between innovation and access in the pharmaceutical industry.从强制许可到规范许可:对制药行业创新与药品可及性冲突的影响
Food Drug Law J. 2003;58(4):711-40.
9
Unsettling drug patent settlements: a framework for presumptive illegality.令人不安的药品专利和解:推定非法性的框架。
Mich Law Rev. 2009 Oct;108(1):37-80.
10
Differential pricing for pharmaceuticals: reconciling access, R&D and patents.药品差别定价:兼顾可及性、研发与专利
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2003 Sep;3(3):183-205. doi: 10.1023/a:1025384819575.

引用本文的文献

1
Multinational Pharmaceutical Companies Shortchange Canada in Research and Development Investments: Is It Time to Pursue Other Options?跨国制药公司在研发投资上亏待了加拿大:是时候寻求其他选择了吗?
Healthc Policy. 2023 Feb;18(3):17-24. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2023.27038.
2
Canada and access to medicines in developing countries: intellectual property rights first.加拿大与发展中国家的药品可及性:知识产权优先。
Global Health. 2013 Sep 3;9:42. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-42.
3
Canadian pharmacare: looking back, looking forward.加拿大药物保险计划:回顾与展望。
Healthc Policy. 2012 Aug;8(1):14-23.
4
The road to competitive generic drug prices in Canada.加拿大实现仿制药价格具有竞争力的道路。
CMAJ. 2013 Sep 17;185(13):1141-4. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.121367. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
5
On the Nature and Strategies of Organized Interests in Health Care Policy Making.医疗保健政策制定中利益集团的性质与策略
Adm Soc. 2011 Jan 1;43(1):45-65. doi: 10.1177/0095399710390641.
6
The politics behind the implementation of the WTO Paragraph 6 Decision in Canada to increase global drug access.加拿大实施 WTO 第 6 段决定以增加全球药物获取机会的背后政治因素。
Global Health. 2012 Apr 3;8:7. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-8-7.
7
Listening for prescriptions: a national consultation on pharmaceutical policy issues.倾听处方:关于药品政策问题的全国性咨询
Healthc Policy. 2010 Nov;6(2):48-66.
8
The effect of evidence-based drug coverage policies on pharmaceutical r&d: a case study from british columbia.循证药物覆盖政策对药物研发的影响:来自不列颠哥伦比亚省的案例研究
Healthc Policy. 2008 Feb;3(3):e128-53.
9
Research output of the Canadian pharmaceutical industry: where has all the R&D gone?加拿大制药行业的研究产出:所有的研发都去哪儿了?
Healthc Policy. 2006 May;1(4):21-34.