• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

掺假剂对滥用药物尿液荧光偏振免疫分析的影响。

The effects of adulterating agents on FPIA analysis of urine for drugs of abuse.

作者信息

Schwarzhoff R, Cody J T

机构信息

Drug Testing Division, Armstrong Laboratory, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas 78235.

出版信息

J Anal Toxicol. 1993 Jan-Feb;17(1):14-7. doi: 10.1093/jat/17.1.14.

DOI:10.1093/jat/17.1.14
PMID:8429620
Abstract

A variety of chemical agents were evaluated to determine their effects on fluorescence polarization immunoassays for drugs of abuse. Sixteen different agents, at concentrations up to 10%, were tested against urine assays for cannabinoids, cocaine (metabolite), amphetamines, opiates, phencyclidine (PCP), and barbiturates. The potential to cause both false positive and false negative results was evaluated, and assays were performed one and seven days after sample adulteration to simulate different collection/testing formats. All six drug assays were susceptible to one or more adulterating agents, but the degree varied considerably between assays. The cannabinoid assay was most susceptible to adulterant-induced false negative results, and the barbiturate assay was most susceptible to false positive results. The remaining assays demonstrated relatively few, but characteristic effects, some of which were attributable to drug degradation and others to assay interference. Although the results of pH measurement on adulterated samples verified its utility in identifying some samples adulterated with interfering agents, other adulterants that cause substantial effects would not be identified by pH measurements alone.

摘要

评估了多种化学试剂,以确定它们对滥用药物荧光偏振免疫分析的影响。针对尿液中大麻素、可卡因(代谢物)、苯丙胺、阿片类药物、苯环己哌啶(PCP)和巴比妥类药物的检测,测试了16种不同的试剂,浓度最高达10%。评估了导致假阳性和假阴性结果的可能性,并在样本掺假后1天和7天进行检测,以模拟不同的采集/检测形式。所有六种药物检测都易受一种或多种掺假试剂的影响,但不同检测之间的程度差异很大。大麻素检测最易受掺假剂导致的假阴性结果影响,巴比妥类药物检测最易受假阳性结果影响。其余检测显示出相对较少但具有特征性的影响,其中一些归因于药物降解,另一些归因于检测干扰。尽管对掺假样本进行pH测量的结果证实了其在识别一些被干扰剂掺假的样本中的作用,但仅通过pH测量无法识别其他会产生重大影响的掺假剂。

相似文献

1
The effects of adulterating agents on FPIA analysis of urine for drugs of abuse.掺假剂对滥用药物尿液荧光偏振免疫分析的影响。
J Anal Toxicol. 1993 Jan-Feb;17(1):14-7. doi: 10.1093/jat/17.1.14.
2
Interference of common household chemicals in immunoassay methods for drugs of abuse.常见家用化学品对滥用药物免疫分析方法的干扰。
Clin Chem. 1989 Apr;35(4):648-51.
3
Adulterants causing false negatives in illicit drug testing.
Clin Chem. 1988 Nov;34(11):2333-6.
4
Drug screening in urine by cloned enzyme donor immunoassay (CEDIA) and kinetic interaction of microparticles in solution (KIMS): a comparative study.通过克隆酶供体免疫分析(CEDIA)和溶液中微粒的动力学相互作用(KIMS)对尿液进行药物筛查:一项比较研究。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(4):479-87. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2006.087.
5
Papain: a novel urine adulterant.木瓜蛋白酶:一种新型尿液掺假物。
J Anal Toxicol. 2005 Jul-Aug;29(5):275-95. doi: 10.1093/jat/29.5.275.
6
Determination of five abused drugs in nitrite-adulterated urine by immunoassays and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.采用免疫分析法和气相色谱 - 质谱联用技术测定亚硝酸盐掺杂尿液中的五种滥用药物。
J Anal Toxicol. 1998 Oct;22(6):474-80. doi: 10.1093/jat/22.6.474.
7
Cloned enzyme donor immunoassay (CEDIA) for drugs-of-abuse screening.
Clin Chem. 1995 Jan;41(1):92-8.
8
Performance of Abusign drugs-of-abuse slide tests with particluar emphasis on concentrations near the cutoff: comparison with FPIA-ADx and confirmation of results with GC-MS.阿片类药物滥用玻片试验的性能,特别强调接近临界值的浓度:与荧光偏振免疫分析-ADx的比较及气相色谱-质谱法对结果的确认
J Anal Toxicol. 1998 Jan-Feb;22(1):40-4. doi: 10.1093/jat/22.1.40.
9
Confirmatory tests for drugs in the workplace by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.采用气相色谱-质谱联用技术对工作场所中的药物进行确证检测。
J Chromatogr A. 1994 Jul 15;674(1-2):73-86. doi: 10.1016/0021-9673(94)85218-9.
10
Prevalence of drugs of abuse in urine of drivers involved in road accidents in France: a collaborative study.法国道路交通事故涉事司机尿液中滥用药物的流行情况:一项合作研究。
J Forensic Sci. 1998 Jul;43(4):806-11.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of urine adulterants on commercial drug abuse screening test strip results.尿液掺杂剂对商业药物滥用筛查检测试纸结果的影响。
Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2020 Mar 1;71(1):87-93. doi: 10.2478/aiht-2020-71-3315.
2
Immunoassays for drug screening in urine : Chances, challenges, and pitfalls.尿液中药物筛查的免疫测定:机遇、挑战与陷阱
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2006 Jun;2(2):75-83. doi: 10.1385/FSMP:2:2:75.
3
A case of psychosis after use of a detoxification kit and a review of techniques, risks, and regulations associated with the subversion of urine drug tests.
一例使用戒毒试剂盒后出现精神病的病例以及对与尿液药物检测作弊相关的技术、风险和法规的综述。
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2011;13(5). doi: 10.4088/PCC.11r01178.