• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Adulterants causing false negatives in illicit drug testing.

作者信息

Mikkelsen S L, Ash K O

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City 84132.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 1988 Nov;34(11):2333-6.

PMID:3052928
Abstract

Illicit-drug users may attempt to falsify results by in vitro adulteration of specimens. We investigated eight additives (NaCl, Visine, handsoap, Drano, bleach, vinegar, golden-seal tea, and lemon juice) claimed by drug users to invalidate enzyme immunoassay (EIA) drug assays. We also analyzed adulterated urine specimens to determine if they could be identified, adding adulterants at several concentrations to 222 EIA-positive specimens confirmed by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC/MS) to contain illicit drugs. To identify adulterated urines, we monitored pH, relative density, and urine color and turbidity at adulterant concentrations that falsified EIA results. Specimens contaminated with NaCl had relative densities greater than 1.035. Liquid Drano, bleach, and vinegar shifted urine pH outside the physiological range. Golden-seal tea caused a dark appearance, and specimens containing liquid soap were unusually cloudy. Lemon juice had no effect on the assays. Visine was the only adulterant not detected. The adulterants interfered somewhat differently with each of the drug assays. EIA assays for illicit drugs can be invalidated by specimen adulteration producing false-negative results. Therefore, if urine drug testing is to be conducted, pH, relative density, and appearance should be assessed and suspect specimens should be rejected. Not all adulterants can be detected, so observed collection is strongly recommended.

摘要

相似文献

1
Adulterants causing false negatives in illicit drug testing.
Clin Chem. 1988 Nov;34(11):2333-6.
2
The effects of adulterating agents on FPIA analysis of urine for drugs of abuse.掺假剂对滥用药物尿液荧光偏振免疫分析的影响。
J Anal Toxicol. 1993 Jan-Feb;17(1):14-7. doi: 10.1093/jat/17.1.14.
3
CEDIA for screening drugs of abuse in urine and the effect of adulterants.
J Forensic Sci. 1995 Jul;40(4):614-8.
4
Interference of common household chemicals in immunoassay methods for drugs of abuse.常见家用化学品对滥用药物免疫分析方法的干扰。
Clin Chem. 1989 Apr;35(4):648-51.
5
Drug screening in urine by cloned enzyme donor immunoassay (CEDIA) and kinetic interaction of microparticles in solution (KIMS): a comparative study.通过克隆酶供体免疫分析(CEDIA)和溶液中微粒的动力学相互作用(KIMS)对尿液进行药物筛查:一项比较研究。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(4):479-87. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2006.087.
6
Papain: a novel urine adulterant.木瓜蛋白酶:一种新型尿液掺假物。
J Anal Toxicol. 2005 Jul-Aug;29(5):275-95. doi: 10.1093/jat/29.5.275.
7
Determining the effects of adulterants on drug detection via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and adulterant tests strips.通过酶联免疫吸附测定法和掺假检测试纸条确定掺假物质对药物检测的影响。
Drug Test Anal. 2018 Sep;10(9):1383-1393. doi: 10.1002/dta.2404. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
8
Prevalence of drugs used in cases of alleged sexual assault.涉嫌性侵犯案件中所使用药物的流行情况。
J Anal Toxicol. 1999 May-Jun;23(3):141-6. doi: 10.1093/jat/23.3.141.
9
First analytical chemistry study on drug abuse in the Buenos Aires (Argentina) University students.关于布宜诺斯艾利斯(阿根廷)大学生药物滥用问题的首次分析化学研究。
Farmaco. 1998 Jun 30;53(6):389-94. doi: 10.1016/s0014-827x(98)00033-0.
10
Evaluation of a human on-site urine multidrug test for emergency use with dogs.用于犬类紧急情况的人用现场尿液多药检测评估。
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2009 Mar-Apr;45(2):59-66. doi: 10.5326/0450059.

引用本文的文献

1
Ingestion of Fluids of the Ocular Surface Containing Eye Drops of Imidazole Derivatives-Alpha Adrenergic Receptor Agonists as Paragons.摄入含有咪唑衍生物-α肾上腺素能受体激动剂眼药水的眼表液体作为范例。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Jun 9;17(6):758. doi: 10.3390/ph17060758.
2
A critical review of workplace drug testing methods for old and new psychoactive substances: Gaps, advances, and perspectives.新旧精神活性物质工作场所药物检测方法的批判性综述:差距、进展与展望。
Saudi Pharm J. 2024 May;32(5):102065. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102065. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
3
More than meets the eye: a scoping review on the non-medical uses of THZ eye drops.
不止于眼:THZ 眼药水非医疗用途的范围综述。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2024 Jun;20(2):569-578. doi: 10.1007/s12024-023-00680-9. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
4
Point-of-care community drug checking technologies: an insider look at the scientific principles and practical considerations.即时社区药物检测技术:科学原理与实际考虑的内部视角。
Harm Reduct J. 2023 Mar 25;20(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00764-3.
5
Effect of urine adulterants on commercial drug abuse screening test strip results.尿液掺杂剂对商业药物滥用筛查检测试纸结果的影响。
Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2020 Mar 1;71(1):87-93. doi: 10.2478/aiht-2020-71-3315.
6
Immunoassays for drug screening in urine : Chances, challenges, and pitfalls.尿液中药物筛查的免疫测定:机遇、挑战与陷阱
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2006 Jun;2(2):75-83. doi: 10.1385/FSMP:2:2:75.
7
A case of psychosis after use of a detoxification kit and a review of techniques, risks, and regulations associated with the subversion of urine drug tests.一例使用戒毒试剂盒后出现精神病的病例以及对与尿液药物检测作弊相关的技术、风险和法规的综述。
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2011;13(5). doi: 10.4088/PCC.11r01178.
8
The role of physicians as medical review officers in workplace drug testing programs. In pursuit of the last nanogram.医生在工作场所药物检测项目中作为医学审查官员的角色。追求最后一纳克。
West J Med. 1990 May;152(5):514-24.
9
Chemical dependency and drug testing in the workplace.职场中的化学物质依赖与药物检测。
West J Med. 1990 May;152(5):506-13.