Krausz M M, Perel A, Eimerl D, Cotev S
Ann Surg. 1977 Apr;185(4):429-34. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197704000-00010.
The effect of volume loading in 20 patients with clinical and bacteriological evidence of generalized sepsis was studied. The patients were divided into two groups according to their response to volume loading. Group A included 9 patients in whom the initial pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PWP)was lower than the central venous pressure (CVP). In this group the intravenous administration of 5089+/-409ml/24 hr fluids was accompanied by a significant rise in blood pressure from 94.4+/-9.3mm Hg to 118.9+/-6.3 MM Hg with no significant change in pulse rate or CVP. PWP rose from 5.7 +/- 1.8 to 10.0 +/- 1.4. The rise in cardiac output from 8.0+/-1.3 liter/min to 9.7+/-1.1 liter/min was not statistically significant. Group B included 11 patients in whom the initial PWP was higher than the CVP. In this group, signs of fluid overloading appeared after administration of 3151+/-540ml/24 hr. There was no significant change in blood pressure, pulse rate, CVP, PWP or cardiac output. Urine output was adequate in both groups. This volume load did not affect pulmonary oxygenating capacity (PaO2/F1O2) and effective lung compliance in both groups, but the maintenance of an unchanged oxygenating capacity necessitated an increase in PEEP in some patients. Thus, synchronous monitoring of PWP and CVP in septic shock is helpful in selecting patients (Group A) who will best respond to fluid loading without deterioration of pulmonary oxygenating capacity. PEEP ventilation may be necessary in some patients to maintain the favorable effect of volume loading.
对20例有全身性败血症临床和细菌学证据的患者进行了容量负荷效应研究。根据患者对容量负荷的反应将其分为两组。A组包括9例患者,其初始肺毛细血管楔压(PWP)低于中心静脉压(CVP)。该组患者静脉输注5089±409ml/24小时液体后,血压从94.4±9.3mmHg显著升至118.9±6.3mmHg,脉搏率或CVP无显著变化。PWP从5.7±1.8升至10.0±1.4。心输出量从8.0±1.3升/分钟升至9.7±1.1升/分钟,差异无统计学意义。B组包括11例患者,其初始PWP高于CVP。该组患者输注3151±540ml/24小时后出现液体超负荷迹象。血压、脉搏率、CVP、PWP或心输出量无显著变化。两组患者尿量均充足。该容量负荷对两组患者的肺氧合能力(PaO2/F1O2)和有效肺顺应性均无影响,但在部分患者中,维持不变的氧合能力需要增加呼气末正压(PEEP)。因此,在感染性休克中同步监测PWP和CVP有助于选择对液体负荷反应最佳且肺氧合能力不恶化的患者(A组)。部分患者可能需要进行PEEP通气以维持容量负荷的良好效果。