Tan S T, Roberts R H, Blake G B
Plastic Surgery Unit, Burwood Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Br J Plast Surg. 1993 Jan;46(1):79-81. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(93)90071-i.
A prospective, randomised, controlled study compared DuoDERM E (DE) with scarlet red (SR) in the treatment of split skin graft donor areas in 60 patients. Healing and donor site comfort were significantly better in the DE group. There was no clinical infection in either group. The wound leakage rate was higher in the DE group, requiring an average of 0.8 replacement dressings per donor site as compared with an average of 0.04 for the SR group. An estimate of the cost per donor site for the first ten days of dressing is given.
一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究比较了多德美E（DE）与猩红热（SR）对60例患者皮肤移植供区的治疗效果。DE组的愈合情况和供区舒适度明显更好。两组均无临床感染。DE组的伤口渗漏率较高，每个供区平均需要更换0.8次敷料，而SR组平均为0.04次。文中给出了每个供区前十天敷料的成本估算。
