Tan S T, Roberts R H, Sinclair S W
Plastic Surgery Unit, Burwood Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Br J Plast Surg. 1993 Jan;46(1):82-4. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(93)90072-j.
A prospective, randomised, controlled study compared Zenoderm (ZM) with DuoDERM E (DE) in the treatment of split skin graft donor areas in 64 patients. The donor site comfort was similar in the two groups. DE usage resulted in significantly faster healing but also a higher leakage rate than ZM. Two patients in the ZM group developed infection in their donor sites. The cost is significantly less with ZM than DE.
一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究对64例患者在使用微粒皮植皮供区治疗中，将Zenoderm（ZM）与多爱肤E（DE）进行了比较。两组供区舒适度相似。使用DE愈合明显更快，但渗漏率也高于ZM。ZM组有2例患者供区发生感染。ZM的成本明显低于DE。
