Balaban E P, Sheehan R G, Demian S E, Cox J V, Frenkel E P
Simmons Cancer Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dallas, Tx.
Am J Hematol. 1993 Feb;42(2):177-81. doi: 10.1002/ajh.2830420207.
The serum ferritin (SERFER) may be elevated and misleading in the setting of chronic disease (chronic inflammation, liver disease, and neoplasm). The red cell ferritin (RBCFER) may be more stable in clinical situations that affect the SERFER. We compared the ability of SERFER and RBCFER to assess iron stores in these settings. Iron stores were defined by bone marrow aspirate staining. We studied 120 anemic (Hb < 14 g/dl) male patients. Twenty-eight (23%) were iron deficient based on the absence of marrow iron. The SERFER correlation with marrow iron stores (r = 0.58; P < 0.001) was better than the RBCFER (r = 0.36; P < 0.001). Cutoff values for the diagnosis of iron deficiency were determined by chi-square analysis (SERFER < 70 ng/ml; RBCFER < or = 4 ag/RBC). The sensitivity for detecting iron deficiency with SERFER (0.60) was less than RBCFER (0.82). The specificity of SERFER (0.90) was slightly better than RBCFER (0.83). Neither difference reached statistical significance (P > 0.05). The positive predictive value between the two assays was the same (SERFER 0.65 vs. RBCFER 0.59). The combination of SERFER < 70 ng/ml with RBCFER < or = 4 ag/RBC was more specific (0.97) when compared with the SERFER alone (0.90) (P = 0.04). In addition, the potential of this combination to predict iron deficiency (0.82) was higher than that seen with either SERFER (0.65) or the RBCFER (0.59). Our findings show that the RBCFER as a single assay is not anymore accurate than the SERFER. However, we find that the RBCFER can effectively complement the SERFER to either predict iron depletion or confirm the presence of bone marrow iron.
在慢性病(慢性炎症、肝病和肿瘤)情况下,血清铁蛋白(SERFER)可能会升高并产生误导。在影响SERFER的临床情况下,红细胞铁蛋白(RBCFER)可能更稳定。我们比较了SERFER和RBCFER在这些情况下评估铁储备的能力。铁储备通过骨髓穿刺涂片染色来定义。我们研究了120名贫血(血红蛋白<14 g/dl)男性患者。根据骨髓铁缺乏情况,28名(23%)患者缺铁。SERFER与骨髓铁储备的相关性(r = 0.58;P < 0.001)优于RBCFER(r = 0.36;P < 0.001)。通过卡方分析确定缺铁诊断的临界值(SERFER < 70 ng/ml;RBCFER <或= 4 ag/RBC)。SERFER检测缺铁的敏感性(0.60)低于RBCFER(0.82)。SERFER的特异性(0.90)略优于RBCFER(0.83)。两者差异均未达到统计学意义(P > 0.05)。两种检测方法的阳性预测值相同(SERFER为0.65,RBCFER为0.59)。与单独使用SERFER(0.90)相比,SERFER < 70 ng/ml与RBCFER <或= 4 ag/RBC联合使用时特异性更高(0.97)(P = 0.04)。此外,这种联合预测缺铁的可能性(0.82)高于单独使用SERFER(0.65)或RBCFER(0.59)。我们的研究结果表明,单独作为一种检测方法,RBCFER并不比SERFER更准确。然而,我们发现RBCFER可以有效地补充SERFER,以预测铁耗竭或确认骨髓铁的存在。