Winnie A P, La Vallee D A, Pe Sosa B, Masud K Z
Can Anaesth Soc J. 1977 Mar;24(2):252-62. doi: 10.1007/BF03006238.
The present study has utilized a clinical model to compare the pharmacokinetics of four currently available amide local anaesthetic agents in theoretically equipotent concentrations. In addition to providing comparative data concerning the onset and duration of analgesia, anaesthesia, paresis, and paralysis, it has provided definitive confirmation of the clinical impression that under certain circumstances following the performance of a nerve block, motor blockade may actually precede sensory blockade, and an explanation for this seeming violation of established neurophysiological principles has been postulated. The study has also raised questions concerning the sequence of recovery from motor and sensory blockade which still await explanation.
本研究采用了一种临床模型,以比较四种目前可用的酰胺类局部麻醉药在理论上等效浓度下的药代动力学。除了提供有关镇痛、麻醉、轻瘫和麻痹的起效时间和持续时间的比较数据外,它还明确证实了临床印象,即在某些情况下进行神经阻滞后,运动阻滞可能实际上先于感觉阻滞,并对这种看似违反既定神经生理学原理的现象提出了解释。该研究还提出了关于运动和感觉阻滞恢复顺序的问题,这些问题仍有待解释。