• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量注意力对简单视觉搜索的影响。

Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search.

作者信息

Palmer J, Ames C T, Lindsey D T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Feb;19(1):108-30. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.1.108.

DOI:10.1037//0096-1523.19.1.108
PMID:8440980
Abstract

Set-size in visual search may be due to 1 or more of 3 factors: sensory processes such as lateral masking between stimuli, attentional processes limiting the perception of individual stimuli, or attentional processes affecting the decision rules for combining information from multiple stimuli. These possibilities were evaluated in tasks such as searching for a longer line among shorter lines. To evaluate sensory contributions, display set-size effects were compared with cuing conditions that held sensory phenomena constant. Similar effects for the display and cue manipulations suggested that sensory processes contributed little under the conditions of this experiment. To evaluate the contribution of decision processes, the set-size effects were modeled with signal detection theory. In these models, a decision effect alone was sufficient to predict the set-size effects without any attentional limitation due to perception.

摘要

视觉搜索中的集合大小可能归因于以下三个因素中的一个或多个

感觉过程,如刺激之间的侧向掩蔽;注意力过程,限制对单个刺激的感知;或注意力过程,影响从多个刺激中组合信息的决策规则。这些可能性在诸如在较短线条中寻找较长线条的任务中进行了评估。为了评估感觉因素的作用,将显示集合大小效应与保持感觉现象不变的提示条件进行了比较。显示和提示操作的类似效应表明,在本实验条件下,感觉过程的作用很小。为了评估决策过程的作用,用信号检测理论对集合大小效应进行了建模。在这些模型中,仅决策效应就足以预测集合大小效应,而无需因感知而产生的任何注意力限制。

相似文献

1
Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search.测量注意力对简单视觉搜索的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Feb;19(1):108-30. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.1.108.
2
The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search.隐蔽注意对视觉搜索中集合大小和离心率效应的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Apr;24(2):673-92. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.2.673.
3
Visual attention modulates signal detectability.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Nov;16(4):802-11. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.16.4.802.
4
Set-size effects in visual search: the effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks.视觉搜索中的集合大小效应:对于简单任务,注意力的效应与刺激无关。
Vision Res. 1994 Jul;34(13):1703-21. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90128-7.
5
Is there feature-based attentional selection in visual search?视觉搜索中是否存在基于特征的注意选择?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Jun;22(3):758-79. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.3.758.
6
Modulating the attentional repulsion effect.调节注意力排斥效应。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jan;127(1):137-45. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.03.003. Epub 2007 May 8.
7
Attentional set for axis of symmetry in symmetry-defined visual search.
Percept Psychophys. 2006 Oct;68(7):1153-62. doi: 10.3758/bf03193717.
8
Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 May;16(2):332-50. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.16.2.332.
9
What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing.枚举研究能向我们揭示的关于空间注意力的内容:有限容量前注意加工的证据
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Apr;19(2):331-51. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.2.331.
10
Less attention and more perception in cued line bisection.线索化直线二等分任务中注意力减少而感知增强。
Brain Cogn. 1994 May;25(1):24-33. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1994.1020.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal visual search with highly heuristic decision rules.使用高度启发式决策规则的最优视觉搜索。
J Vis. 2025 Apr 1;25(4):5. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.4.5.
2
How expectations alter search performance.期望如何改变搜索性能。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Feb;87(2):334-353. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03022-9. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
3
Optimal Visual Search with Highly Heuristic Decision Rules.具有高度启发式决策规则的最优视觉搜索
ArXiv. 2025 Feb 10:arXiv:2409.12124v3.
4
Conflicting Sensory Information Sharpens the Neural Representations of Early Selective Visuospatial Attention.冲突的感觉信息能使早期选择性视空间注意力的神经表征更加清晰。
J Neurosci. 2024 Aug 14;44(33):e2012232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2012-23.2024.
5
Subitizing endures in sequential rather than simultaneous comparison tasks.在顺序比较任务中而不是在同时比较任务中,数量估计持续存在。
Psych J. 2024 Oct;13(5):726-737. doi: 10.1002/pchj.750. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
6
Searching for a tactile target: the impact of set-size on the N140cc.寻找触觉目标:刺激集大小对N140cc的影响
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Jun 22;17:1209555. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1209555. eCollection 2023.
7
Hierarchical Bayesian perceptual template modeling of mechanisms of spatial attention in central and peripheral cuing.中心和外周提示条件下空间注意机制的分层贝叶斯感知模板建模。
J Vis. 2023 Feb 1;23(2):12. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.2.12.
8
Form Properties of Moving Targets Bias Smooth Pursuit Target Selection in Monkeys.运动目标的形式特性对猴子的平滑追踪目标选择的影响。
Neurosci Bull. 2023 Aug;39(8):1246-1262. doi: 10.1007/s12264-023-01022-z. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
9
Could simplified stimuli change how the brain performs visual search tasks? A deep neural network study.简化刺激能否改变大脑执行视觉搜索任务的方式?一项深度神经网络研究。
J Vis. 2022 Jun 1;22(7):3. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.7.3.
10
Behavior in a visual search task with moving dot stimuli.在具有移动点刺激的视觉搜索任务中的行为。
J Neurophysiol. 2022 May 18;127(6):1564-73. doi: 10.1152/jn.00375.2021.