• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简化刺激能否改变大脑执行视觉搜索任务的方式?一项深度神经网络研究。

Could simplified stimuli change how the brain performs visual search tasks? A deep neural network study.

机构信息

Emory University, Department of Biology, O. Wayne Rollins Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

J Vis. 2022 Jun 1;22(7):3. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.7.3.

DOI:10.1167/jov.22.7.3
PMID:35675057
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9187944/
Abstract

Visual search is a complex behavior influenced by many factors. To control for these factors, many studies use highly simplified stimuli. However, the statistics of these stimuli are very different from the statistics of the natural images that the human visual system is optimized by evolution and experience to perceive. Could this difference change search behavior? If so, simplified stimuli may contribute to effects typically attributed to cognitive processes, such as selective attention. Here we use deep neural networks to test how optimizing models for the statistics of one distribution of images constrains performance on a task using images from a different distribution. We train four deep neural network architectures on one of three source datasets-natural images, faces, and x-ray images-and then adapt them to a visual search task using simplified stimuli. This adaptation produces models that exhibit performance limitations similar to humans, whereas models trained on the search task alone exhibit no such limitations. However, we also find that deep neural networks trained to classify natural images exhibit similar limitations when adapted to a search task that uses a different set of natural images. Therefore, the distribution of data alone cannot explain this effect. We discuss how future work might integrate an optimization-based approach into existing models of visual search behavior.

摘要

视觉搜索是一种受多种因素影响的复杂行为。为了控制这些因素,许多研究使用高度简化的刺激。然而,这些刺激的统计数据与人类视觉系统通过进化和经验优化来感知的自然图像的统计数据大不相同。这种差异会改变搜索行为吗?如果是这样,简化的刺激可能会促进通常归因于认知过程的效果,例如选择性注意。在这里,我们使用深度神经网络来测试优化模型对一种图像分布的统计数据如何限制使用不同分布的图像进行任务的性能。我们在三个源数据集(自然图像、人脸和 X 射线图像)中的一个上训练了四个深度神经网络架构,然后使用简化的刺激将它们适应于视觉搜索任务。这种适应会产生表现出类似于人类的性能限制的模型,而仅在搜索任务上训练的模型则没有表现出这种限制。然而,我们还发现,当适应使用不同的自然图像集的搜索任务时,经过训练用于分类自然图像的深度神经网络也会表现出类似的限制。因此,数据的分布本身并不能解释这种效果。我们讨论了未来的工作如何将基于优化的方法整合到现有的视觉搜索行为模型中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97c/9187944/ab35c9b84ac4/jovi-22-7-3-f007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97c/9187944/554859b4f17c/jovi-22-7-3-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97c/9187944/f7cc355b3092/jovi-22-7-3-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97c/9187944/f7e46bdceecd/jovi-22-7-3-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97c/9187944/48107903eefa/jovi-22-7-3-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97c/9187944/bb602aafa5d7/jovi-22-7-3-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97c/9187944/968ec6e15bc6/jovi-22-7-3-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97c/9187944/ab35c9b84ac4/jovi-22-7-3-f007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97c/9187944/554859b4f17c/jovi-22-7-3-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97c/9187944/f7cc355b3092/jovi-22-7-3-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97c/9187944/f7e46bdceecd/jovi-22-7-3-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97c/9187944/48107903eefa/jovi-22-7-3-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97c/9187944/bb602aafa5d7/jovi-22-7-3-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97c/9187944/968ec6e15bc6/jovi-22-7-3-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97c/9187944/ab35c9b84ac4/jovi-22-7-3-f007.jpg

相似文献

1
Could simplified stimuli change how the brain performs visual search tasks? A deep neural network study.简化刺激能否改变大脑执行视觉搜索任务的方式?一项深度神经网络研究。
J Vis. 2022 Jun 1;22(7):3. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.7.3.
2
Deep Neural Networks for Modeling Visual Perceptual Learning.深度神经网络在视觉感知学习建模中的应用。
J Neurosci. 2018 Jul 4;38(27):6028-6044. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1620-17.2018. Epub 2018 May 23.
3
Transfer of Learning from Vision to Touch: A Hybrid Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Visuo-Tactile 3D Object Recognition.从视觉到触觉的迁移学习:用于视触 3D 物体识别的混合深度卷积神经网络。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 27;21(1):113. doi: 10.3390/s21010113.
4
Bi-channel image registration and deep-learning segmentation (BIRDS) for efficient, versatile 3D mapping of mouse brain.双通道图像配准和深度学习分割(BIRDS)用于高效、通用的小鼠大脑 3D 映射。
Elife. 2021 Jan 18;10:e63455. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63455.
5
Large-Scale, High-Resolution Comparison of the Core Visual Object Recognition Behavior of Humans, Monkeys, and State-of-the-Art Deep Artificial Neural Networks.大规模、高分辨率的人类、猴子和最先进的深度人工神经网络核心视觉对象识别行为比较。
J Neurosci. 2018 Aug 15;38(33):7255-7269. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0388-18.2018. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
6
Capacity Limitations of Visual Search in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.深度卷积神经网络中视觉搜索的容量限制。
Neural Comput. 2022 Oct 7;34(11):2294-2308. doi: 10.1162/neco_a_01538.
7
Optimizing neural networks for medical data sets: A case study on neonatal apnea prediction.优化神经网络在医学数据集上的应用:以新生儿呼吸暂停预测为例的研究
Artif Intell Med. 2019 Jul;98:59-76. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
8
Improved object recognition using neural networks trained to mimic the brain's statistical properties.利用模仿大脑统计特性的神经网络来提高物体识别能力。
Neural Netw. 2020 Nov;131:103-114. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
9
Deep convolutional neural network and IoT technology for healthcare.用于医疗保健的深度卷积神经网络和物联网技术。
Digit Health. 2024 Jan 17;10:20552076231220123. doi: 10.1177/20552076231220123. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
10
Modeling task-based fMRI data via deep belief network with neural architecture search.通过基于深度置信网络的神经架构搜索对基于任务的 fMRI 数据进行建模。
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2020 Jul;83:101747. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101747. Epub 2020 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Disrupted visual input unveils the computational details of artificial neural networks for face perception.视觉输入的中断揭示了用于面部感知的人工神经网络的计算细节。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2022 Nov 29;16:1054421. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2022.1054421. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
CNN-based search model fails to account for human attention guidance by simple visual features.基于 CNN 的搜索模型未能通过简单的视觉特征来解释人类的注意力引导。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jan;86(1):9-15. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02697-2. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
2
Five Factors that Guide Attention in Visual Search.视觉搜索中引导注意力的五个因素。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Mar;1(3). doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0058. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
3
Capacity Limitations of Visual Search in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.深度卷积神经网络中视觉搜索的容量限制。
Neural Comput. 2022 Oct 7;34(11):2294-2308. doi: 10.1162/neco_a_01538.
4
Confidence Score: The Forgotten Dimension of Object Detection Performance Evaluation.置信度得分:目标检测性能评估中被遗忘的维度。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jun 25;21(13):4350. doi: 10.3390/s21134350.
5
Five points to check when comparing visual perception in humans and machines.比较人与机器的视觉感知时需要检查的五个要点。
J Vis. 2021 Mar 1;21(3):16. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.3.16.
6
Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.引导式搜索 6.0:一种更新的视觉搜索模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1060-1092. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01859-9. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
7
How Computational Modeling Can Force Theory Building in Psychological Science.计算建模如何推动心理科学中的理论构建。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Jul;16(4):789-802. doi: 10.1177/1745691620970585. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
8
Crowding and attention in a framework of neural network model.神经网络模型框架中的拥挤与注意力
J Vis. 2020 Dec 2;20(13):19. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.13.19.
9
If deep learning is the answer, what is the question?如果深度学习是答案,那么问题是什么?
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021 Jan;22(1):55-67. doi: 10.1038/s41583-020-00395-8. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
10
Performance vs. competence in human-machine comparisons.人机比较中的表现与能力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Oct 27;117(43):26562-26571. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1905334117. Epub 2020 Oct 13.