Reed S, Lissner G
Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;9(1):27-31. doi: 10.1097/00002341-199303000-00003.
Sixteen asymptomatic volunteers had their right lower puncta occluded with a Freeman silicone plug. They then went about their normal daily activities for approximately 1 week under the stress of a cold Chicago winter. Of the 16 eyes that were plugged, 4 had epiphora. The episodes were of short duration and did not have any effect on the subjects' daily activities. When comparing the incidence of epiphora between the plugged eyes and the control eyes, there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.082). Also, when comparing the modified Jones I test and Schirmer tests, with and without anesthesia, there was no significant difference in the values between the plugged and the control eyes (p > 0.05). The only difference noted was in the dye disappearance test (p < 0.05). These results support the hypothesis that in selected patients, even under stressful environmental conditions, a single healthy canaliculus may provide sufficient tear drainage from a normal eye to prevent bothersome subjective symptoms.
16名无症状志愿者的右下泪点被Freeman硅胶塞堵塞。然后,在芝加哥寒冷的冬季压力下,他们进行了大约1周的正常日常活动。在被堵塞的16只眼中,有4只出现溢泪。这些发作持续时间短,对受试者的日常活动没有任何影响。比较被堵塞眼睛和对照眼睛的溢泪发生率时,没有统计学上的显著差异(p = 0.082)。此外,比较改良的琼斯I试验和泪液分泌试验在有无麻醉情况下的结果时,被堵塞眼睛和对照眼睛的值没有显著差异(p > 0.05)。唯一观察到差异的是染料清除试验(p < 0.05)。这些结果支持了这样一个假设,即在特定患者中,即使在压力环境条件下,一条健康的泪小管也可能为正常眼睛提供足够的泪液引流,以防止出现烦人的主观症状。