Mitchell J D, Lee R, Garan H, Ruskin J N, Torchiana D F, Vlahakes G J
Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114-2696.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993 Mar;105(3):453-62; discussion 462-3.
The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator provides an alternative therapy for medically refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients who are not candidates for ventricular operations or in whom these operations have failed. Currently, however, available devices have limitations. In this report we describe our experience with a programmable, tiered therapy device with anti-ventricular tachyarrhythmia pacing and VVI pacing capabilities (Cadence V-100, Ventritex Inc., Sunnyvale, Calif.). This device offers certain advantages compared with conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: (1) tiered, anti-ventricular tachyarrhythmia therapy incorporating programmable, rate-adaptive burst pacing in addition to energy-programmable cardioversion/defibrillation, (2) biphasic cardioversion/defibrillation waveforms, resulting in lower defibrillation thresholds, (3) the ability to abort therapy for nonsustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias, (4) electrogram storage of detected events for later retrieval and analysis, (5) noninvasive, device-generated programmed stimulation for system testing, and (6) backup VVI pacing capability. Forty patients (aged 14 to 79 years) with ventricular tachyarrhythmias refractory to medical therapy received this device. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 33% +/- 16%. Preoperative electrophysiologic testing revealed inducible monomorphic ventricular tachyarrhythmia responsive to rapid ventricular pacing in 36 patients (90%). An extrapericardial two-patch configuration was used with either epicardial screw-in or bipolar endocardial sensing/pacing wires. No operative mortality and no device-related infection occurred. During a follow-up period of 16 +/- 7 months (range 3 to 30 months), 38 patients remained active with the implanted device; one patient died of congestive heart failure 4 months after implantation, and the system was explanted in one patient who underwent cardiac transplantation. In 33 patients a total of 1815 ventricular tachyarrhythmias were detected that resulted in therapy. Rate-adaptive burst pacing was used as the initial therapy in 1470 episodes and was successful in 1352 instances (92%). Pacing-induced ventricular tachyarrhythmia acceleration occurred in 4% of episodes. The remaining ventricular tachyarrhythmia episodes were treated with cardioversion. In 18 patients (45%) cardioversion therapy was aborted after spontaneous termination of ventricular tachyarrhythmia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
植入式心脏复律除颤器为药物治疗无效的室性快速心律失常患者提供了一种替代疗法,这些患者不适合进行心室手术或手术失败。然而,目前现有的设备存在局限性。在本报告中,我们描述了我们使用一种具有抗室性快速心律失常起搏和VVI起搏功能的可编程分层治疗设备(Cadence V - 100,Ventritex公司,加利福尼亚州桑尼维尔)的经验。与传统的植入式心脏复律除颤器相比,该设备具有某些优势:(1)分层的抗室性快速心律失常治疗,除了能量可编程的心脏复律/除颤外,还包括可编程的频率适应性猝发起搏;(2)双相心脏复律/除颤波形,可降低除颤阈值;(3)能够中止对非持续性室性快速心律失常的治疗;(4)存储检测到的事件的心电图以供后续检索和分析;(5)用于系统测试的非侵入性、设备生成的程控刺激;(6)备用VVI起搏功能。40例(年龄14至79岁)药物治疗无效的室性快速心律失常患者接受了该设备。平均左心室射血分数为33%±16%。术前电生理检查显示,36例患者(90%)可诱发出对快速心室起搏有反应的单形性室性快速心律失常。采用心外膜双电极配置,使用心外膜旋入式或双极心内膜感知/起搏导线。未发生手术死亡和与设备相关的感染。在16±7个月(范围3至30个月)的随访期内,38例患者的植入设备仍在正常工作;1例患者在植入后4个月死于充血性心力衰竭,1例接受心脏移植的患者取出了该系统。33例患者共检测到1815次导致治疗的室性快速心律失常。频率适应性猝发起搏在1470次发作中作为初始治疗方法使用,其中1352次成功(92%)。4%的发作出现起搏诱发的室性快速心律失常加速。其余的室性快速心律失常发作采用心脏复律治疗。18例患者(45%)在室性快速心律失常自发终止后中止了心脏复律治疗。(摘要截短至400字)