Rovegno I
Department of Kinesiology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1993 Mar;64(1):56-68. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1993.10608779.
The study examined what and how 12 K-8 physical education teacher education (PETE) majors learned about a movement approach that was discrepant from their experiences with physical education. This article describes one portion of the findings: what and how PETE majors learned about a movement approach to game play/strategy and mechanisms of advanced knowledge acquisition that contributed to confusion about this topic. Analytic induction and constant comparison were used to analyze qualitative data from interviews, observations, and relevant documents. Eleven PETE majors initially maintained partial or inaccurate conceptions about a movement approach to game play/strategy or taught this content in ways that were inconsistent with their goals for physical education, their knowledge about learning and teaching game skills, and the information presented by faculty and cooperating teachers. Interacting with students' prior knowledge and what and how faculty taught, the following learning mechanisms contributed to confusion: (a) overgeneralizing a contrast between a movement and traditional approach, (b) forming associations prior to adequate differentiation, and (c) overrelying on bottom-up thinking when initially developing lesson/unit progressions.
该研究调查了12名K-8体育教师教育(PETE)专业学生学习一种与他们的体育经历不同的运动方法的内容和方式。本文描述了部分研究结果:PETE专业学生学习游戏玩法/策略的运动方法以及高级知识获取机制的内容和方式,这些导致了他们对该主题的困惑。采用分析归纳法和持续比较法对来自访谈、观察和相关文件的定性数据进行分析。11名PETE专业学生最初对游戏玩法/策略的运动方法持有部分或不准确的概念,或者以与他们的体育目标、关于游戏技能学习和教学的知识以及教师和合作教师所呈现的信息不一致的方式教授这一内容。与学生的先验知识以及教师的教学内容和方式相互作用,以下学习机制导致了困惑:(a)过度概括运动方法与传统方法之间的差异;(b)在充分区分之前形成联想;(c)在最初制定课程/单元进展时过度依赖自下而上的思维。