Ponce J, Garrigues V, Nos P, García E, Siles S, del Val A
Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Hospital La Fe, Valencia.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1993 Jan;83(1):1-4.
Differential diagnosis between idiopathic achalasia and esophageal pseudoachalasia is difficult to perform. One hundred and forty-four consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of primary esophageal motor disorder have been evaluated for pneumatic dilatation of the cardias. Of them, 6 (4.1%) have been finally diagnosed of esophageal pseudoachalasia with carcinoma of the cardias, although in four cases more than one biopsy procedure was needed to establish the diagnosis. The clinical data--higher age, shorter clinical history and higher weight loss--, the higher pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter and the failure of the dilatation suggested the diagnosis, but were uncertain findings. Esophageal biopsy is the only objective method to obtain a definitive diagnosis and should be performed in every patient with an esophageal motor disorder evaluated for dilatation of the cardias and, if negative, it should be repeated when malignancy is suggested by available data.
特发性贲门失弛缓症与食管假性贲门失弛缓症之间的鉴别诊断很难进行。对144例临床诊断为原发性食管运动障碍的连续患者进行了贲门气囊扩张术评估。其中,6例(4.1%)最终被诊断为食管假性贲门失弛缓症合并贲门癌,尽管在4例患者中需要进行不止一次活检才能确诊。临床资料——年龄较大、临床病史较短和体重减轻较多——、食管下括约肌压力较高以及扩张失败提示了诊断,但这些都是不确定的发现。食管活检是获得明确诊断的唯一客观方法,对于每例因贲门扩张而接受评估的食管运动障碍患者都应进行,如果活检结果为阴性,当现有数据提示存在恶性肿瘤时应重复进行活检。