Rigby A S, Wood P H
Arthritis and Rheumatism Council Epidemiology Research Unit, University of Manchester Medical School, Lancashire, Great Britain.
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1993 Jan-Feb;11(1):5-12.
The Rome and New York criteria for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) have been compared in a clinical sample of patients with this disease and other joint disorders. The best individual clinical discriminator was the first Rome criterion, low back pain and stiffness lasting for three months and, in contrast, the New York criterion of dorsolumbar pain performed poorly. On the other hand, the more stringent New York formulation of lumbar spine limitation in all three planes came out as a better discriminator than its Rome counterpart. Both sets of radiographic criteria performed well. Ethical problems remain, which suggests that new criteria need to be developed for use in population surveys. Peripheral joint involvement was also assessed, but there did not appear to be any merit in taking this into account in any subsequent revision of diagnostic criteria for AS.
在患有强直性脊柱炎(AS)及其他关节疾病的临床样本中,对罗马标准和纽约标准进行了比较。最佳的个体临床鉴别指标是首个罗马标准,即下背痛和僵硬持续三个月,相比之下,纽约标准中背腰部疼痛的鉴别效果不佳。另一方面,纽约标准中对腰椎在所有三个平面的限制更为严格,其鉴别效果优于对应的罗马标准。两组影像学标准的表现都很好。伦理问题依然存在,这表明需要制定新的标准用于人群调查。还评估了外周关节受累情况,但在随后对AS诊断标准的任何修订中,考虑这一点似乎并无益处。