• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恋童癖者和青春期前儿童癖者童年期性侵害情况的比较。

A comparison of sexual victimization in the childhoods of pedophiles and hebephiles.

作者信息

Greenberg D M, Bradford J M, Curry S

机构信息

Forensic Service and Sexual Behaviors Clinic, Royal Ottawa Hospital, Canada.

出版信息

J Forensic Sci. 1993 Mar;38(2):432-6.

PMID:8455000
Abstract

The association between perpetration of sexual abuse and the offender's own victimization as a child has been well documented in the literature. Various researchers have examined this relationship by assessing the exclusiveness of the sexual abuser's behavior, the gender of his victims and the gender of his own childhood abuser. This study was designed to assess the differences between pedophiles and hebephiles in features of their own childhood victimization. Subjects were 135 pedophiles and 43 hebephiles who admitted to their offences. A total of 42% of pedophiles and 44% of hebephiles reported being sexually victimized in their own childhoods. Pedophiles reported being molested at a younger age than hebephiles. Both groups appear to chose their age specific victims in accordance with the age of their own experience of sexual victimization. Although the cause of child molestation remains undetermined these results support social learning and modeling theories.

摘要

性虐待行为与犯罪者自身童年时期遭受侵害之间的关联在文献中已有充分记载。众多研究者通过评估性虐待者行为的排他性、其受害者的性别以及自身童年时期施虐者的性别来研究这种关系。本研究旨在评估恋童癖者和青春期前儿童恋癖者在自身童年受害特征方面的差异。研究对象为135名承认犯罪的恋童癖者和43名青春期前儿童恋癖者。共有42%的恋童癖者和44%的青春期前儿童恋癖者报告称自己在童年时期遭受过性侵害。恋童癖者报告称遭受性骚扰的年龄比青春期前儿童恋癖者更小。两组似乎都根据自己性受害经历的年龄来选择特定年龄的受害者。尽管儿童性骚扰的原因仍未确定,但这些结果支持社会学习和模仿理论。

相似文献

1
A comparison of sexual victimization in the childhoods of pedophiles and hebephiles.恋童癖者和青春期前儿童癖者童年期性侵害情况的比较。
J Forensic Sci. 1993 Mar;38(2):432-6.
2
Predictors of child pornography offenses and child sexual abuse in a community sample of pedophiles and hebephiles.在恋童癖和恋童癖患者的社区样本中,预测儿童色情犯罪和儿童性虐待的因素。
Sex Abuse. 2011 Jun;23(2):212-42. doi: 10.1177/1079063210382043. Epub 2010 Oct 9.
3
Infantophilia--a new subcategory of pedophilia?: a preliminary study.恋童癖——一种新的恋童癖子类别?:一项初步研究。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1995;23(1):63-71.
4
The gender identity of pedophiles: what does the outcome data tell us?恋童癖者的性别认同:结果数据告诉了我们什么?
J Child Sex Abus. 2005;14(1):57-74. doi: 10.1300/J070v14n01_04.
5
Alcohol and sexual victimization: a longitudinal study of Norwegian girls.酒精与性侵害:对挪威女孩的一项纵向研究。
Addiction. 1996 Apr;91(4):565-81.
6
Childhood sexual victimization, pedophilic interest, and sexual recidivism.儿童期性侵害、恋童癖兴趣与性再犯
Child Abuse Negl. 2013 Sep;37(9):703-11. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
7
The strength of sexual arousal as a function of the age of the sex offender: comparisons among pedophiles, hebephiles, and teleiophiles.
Sex Abuse. 2005 Oct;17(4):441-56. doi: 10.1177/107906320501700407.
8
Sexual victimization: is there a vicious cycle?性侵害:是否存在恶性循环?
Violence Vict. 1989 Fall;4(3):179-90.
9
Considering the pedophile subculture online. 考虑网络恋童癖亚文化。
Sex Abuse. 2010 Mar;22(1):3-24. doi: 10.1177/1079063209344979.
10
Childhood sexual history of 20 male pedophiles vs. 24 male healthy control subjects.20名男性恋童癖者与24名男性健康对照者的童年性经历。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2002 Nov;190(11):757-66. doi: 10.1097/00005053-200211000-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
The Errors of Karen Franklin's Pretextuality.凯伦·富兰克林的文本前设错误
Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2012 Jan;11(1):59-62. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2012.672945. Epub 2012 Apr 11.