Institute of Sexology and Sexual Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Sex Abuse. 2011 Jun;23(2):212-42. doi: 10.1177/1079063210382043. Epub 2010 Oct 9.
Little is known about factors that distinguish men who act upon their self-identified sexual interest in prepubescent or pubescent children from those who do not. Even less is known about pedophiles or hebephiles who are not involved with the criminal justice system. In this study, a sample of 155 self-referred pedophiles and hebephiles was recruited from the community. All participants met DSM-IV-TR criteria for pedophilia (or paraphilia not otherwise specified for those who were sexually attracted to pubescent children). Two sets of group comparisons were conducted on sociodemographic variables and measures of dynamic risk factors. The first set was based on recent activity and compared men who had committed child pornography only or child sexual abuse offenses in the past six months with men who remained offense-free during the same period. The second set was based on lifetime offense history (excluding the most recent six months) and compared child pornography offenders with child sexual abuse offenders and men who had committed both kinds of offenses. Overall, there were more similarities than differences between groups.
关于能够区分有过与未成年儿童发生性行为意向的男性和没有这种意向的男性的因素，人们知之甚少。对于没有涉及刑事司法系统的恋童癖者或恋童癖者，人们了解得就更少了。在这项研究中，从社区中招募了 155 名自我报告的恋童癖者和恋童癖者。所有参与者都符合 DSM-IV-TR 恋童癖（或对那些对青春期前儿童有性吸引力的人未指定的性癖好）的标准。对社会人口统计学变量和动态风险因素进行了两组分组比较。第一组基于最近的活动，将在过去六个月内仅犯有儿童色情制品罪或儿童性虐待罪的男性与在同一时期未犯罪的男性进行了比较。第二组基于终身犯罪史（不包括最近的六个月），将儿童色情制品罪犯与儿童性虐待罪犯以及同时犯有两种罪行的男性进行了比较。总体而言，各组之间的相似之处多于差异。
