• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么双胞胎中的小胎儿比单胎中的小胎儿死亡率更低?

Why do small twins have a lower mortality rate than small singletons?

作者信息

Buekens P, Wilcox A

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Free University of Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Mar;168(3 Pt 1):937-41. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(12)90849-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9378(12)90849-2
PMID:8456906
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We propose an interpretation of the paradoxically better survival rate among low-birth-weight twins compared with low-birth-weight singletons.

STUDY DESIGN

We used data from Belgian birth and death certificates for 1983 and 1984. The data include 229,964 singletons, 2175 first twins, and 2153 second twins. Weight-specific perinatal mortality rates of twins and singletons were compared; the birth-weight distributions were adjusted to a single mean and SD.

RESULTS

After adjustment, mortality rates at every weight were higher for twins than for singletons.

CONCLUSIONS

The appearance of better survival among small twins compared with small singletons disappears after adjustment to relative birth-weight. There is a large risk resulting from twinning that falls on all twins, regardless of their weight.

摘要

目的

我们提出了一种对低出生体重双胞胎与低出生体重单胎相比存活率反而更高这一矛盾现象的解释。

研究设计

我们使用了1983年和1984年比利时出生和死亡证明的数据。数据包括229,964名单胎、2175对双胞胎中的第一个胎儿以及2153对双胞胎中的第二个胎儿。比较了双胞胎和单胎按体重划分的围产期死亡率;将出生体重分布调整为单一均值和标准差。

结果

调整后,每个体重段双胞胎的死亡率均高于单胎。

结论

在调整相对出生体重后,小双胞胎比小单胎存活率更高的现象消失了。双胞胎妊娠会给所有双胞胎带来巨大风险,无论其体重如何。

相似文献

1
Why do small twins have a lower mortality rate than small singletons?为什么双胞胎中的小胎儿比单胎中的小胎儿死亡率更低?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Mar;168(3 Pt 1):937-41. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(12)90849-2.
2
Perinatal mortality in twin pregnancy: an analysis of birth weight-specific mortality rates and adjusted mortality rates for birth weight distributions.双胎妊娠围产期死亡率:出生体重特异性死亡率及出生体重分布调整死亡率分析
J Perinat Med. 1988;16(2):85-91. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1988.16.2.85.
3
A comparison of pre-discharge survival and morbidity in singleton and twin very low birth weight infants.单胎和双胎极低出生体重儿出院前生存率及发病率的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Sep;80(3 Pt 1):436-9.
4
The effect of maternal smoking on birth weight in twin pregnancies.母亲吸烟对双胎妊娠出生体重的影响。
Early Hum Dev. 1996 Sep 20;46(1-2):43-53. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(96)01739-2.
5
Comparison of infant mortality among twins and singletons: United States 1960 and 1983.双胞胎与单胞胎婴儿死亡率比较:美国,1960年与1983年
Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Jan 15;133(2):133-43. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115852.
6
Estimation of optimal birth weights and gestational ages for twin births in Japan.日本双胎分娩最佳出生体重和胎龄的估计。
BMC Public Health. 2006 Feb 24;6:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-45.
7
Perinatal outcome of twins compared to singletons of the same gestational age: a case-control study.与相同孕周的单胎相比,双胎的围产期结局:一项病例对照研究。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2011 Feb;14(1):88-93. doi: 10.1375/twin.14.1.88.
8
The role of antenatal corticosteroids in twin pregnancies complicated by preterm birth.产前皮质类固醇在双胎妊娠合并早产中的作用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):482.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.037. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
9
Low birth weight in twins versus singletons: separate entities and different implications for child growth and survival.双胞胎与单胎的低出生体重:不同的情况及其对儿童生长和生存的不同影响。
Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma). 1981;30(1):1-8. doi: 10.1017/s0001566000006589.
10
Birthweight and perinatal mortality among singletons and twins in north-eastern Tanzania.坦桑尼亚东北部单胎和双胎的出生体重与围产期死亡率
Scand J Public Health. 2008 Sep;36(7):761-8. doi: 10.1177/1403494808089559. Epub 2008 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Does Adjusting for Causal Intermediate Confounders Resolve the Perinatal Crossover Paradox?对因果中间混杂因素进行调整能否解决围产期交叉悖论?
Epidemiology. 2025 May 1;36(3):350-362. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001848. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
2
A compelling symmetry: The extended fetuses-at-risk perspective on modal, optimal and relative birthweight and gestational age.引人注目的对称关系:风险扩展型胎儿视角下的理想、最佳与相对出生体重和胎龄。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 30;15(11):e0238673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238673. eCollection 2020.
3
Different levels of cardiometabolic indicators in multiple vs. singleton children.
多胎与单胎儿童的不同心血管代谢指标水平。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Sep 11;19(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1707-0.
4
Prophylactic Sildenafil in Preterm Infants at Risk of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Pilot Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial.预防性应用西地那非治疗有支气管肺发育不良风险的早产儿:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的初步试验。
Clin Drug Investig. 2019 Nov;39(11):1093-1107. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00834-0.
5
Towards a unified perinatal theory: Reconciling the births-based and fetus-at-risk models of perinatal mortality.迈向统一的围产理论:协调基于出生和胎儿风险的围产死亡模型。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;33(2):101-112. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12537. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
6
The fetuses-at-risk approach: survival analysis from a fetal perspective.高危胎儿法:从胎儿角度进行的生存分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Apr;97(4):454-465. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13194. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
7
Methodological Challenges in International Comparisons of Perinatal Mortality.围产期死亡率国际比较中的方法学挑战
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2017;4(2):73-82. doi: 10.1007/s40471-017-0101-4. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
8
Confounding, causality, and confusion: the role of intermediate variables in interpreting observational studies in obstetrics.混杂因素、因果关系与混淆:中间变量在解释产科观察性研究中的作用
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;217(2):167-175. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
9
Perinatal Outcome of the Second Twin at a Tertiary Care Center in India.印度一家三级医疗中心第二对双胞胎的围产期结局
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Dec;66(6):441-447. doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0724-7. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
10
Birthweight percentiles for twin birth neonates by gestational age in China.中国双胎新生儿胎龄别出生体重百分位。
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 10;6:31290. doi: 10.1038/srep31290.