Suppr超能文献

可变弹性概念或许可以解释冠状动脉收缩期血流受阻现象。

Varying elastance concept may explain coronary systolic flow impediment.

作者信息

Krams R, Sipkema P, Westerhof N

机构信息

Laboratory for Physiology, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Physiol. 1989 Nov;257(5 Pt 2):H1471-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1989.257.5.H1471.

Abstract

We measured phasic arterial coronary inflow in the blood-perfused isolated cat heart (n = 5) with a balloon in the left ventricle under well-defined conditions, i.e., constant perfusion pressure, constant vasomotor tone (maximal vasodilation), and heart rate. The normalized amplitude (A) between systolic flow (Fs) and diastolic flow (Fd) [A = (Fd - Fs)/Fd] was related to systolic left ventricular pressure (Ps, range 1.6-17 kPa, 1 kPa = 7.5 mmHg) for different isovolumic beats obtained by changes in balloon volume and for low load isobarically ejecting beats (pressure 0.2 kPa). The data were fitted to A = a + bPs with a = 0.70 +/- 0.15 (SD) and b = 0.005 +/- 0.005 kPa-1. This relation indicates a very weak effect of left ventricular systolic pressure on normalized flow amplitude. Thus the hypothesis that left ventricular pressure is the sole determinant impeding coronary flow could not be confirmed. However, our data could be explained on basis of the time-varying elastance concept (H. Suga, K. Sagawa, and A. A. Shoukas. Circ. Res. 32: 314-322, 1973). The intravascular and luminal (cavity) compartments both are assumed to be subject to a time-varying elastance. The time-varying luminal elastance is similar for isovolumic and isobaric beats. We assume that the elastance of the vascular compartment also behaves the same for these beats, and therefore coronary flow is affected similarly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

我们在明确的条件下,即在恒定灌注压力、恒定血管舒缩张力(最大血管舒张)和心率的情况下,使用置于左心室内的球囊,对5只血液灌注的离体猫心脏进行了阶段性冠状动脉血流测量。通过改变球囊容积获得不同的等容搏动以及低负荷等压射血搏动(压力为0.2 kPa),收缩期血流(Fs)和舒张期血流(Fd)之间的归一化幅度[A = (Fd - Fs)/Fd]与收缩期左心室压力(Ps,范围为1.6 - 17 kPa,1 kPa = 7.5 mmHg)相关。数据拟合为A = a + bPs,其中a = 0.70 ± 0.15(标准差),b = 0.005 ± 0.005 kPa⁻¹。这种关系表明左心室收缩压对归一化血流幅度的影响非常微弱。因此,左心室压力是阻碍冠状动脉血流的唯一决定因素这一假设无法得到证实。然而,我们的数据可以基于时变弹性概念(H. Suga、K. Sagawa和A. A. Shoukas。《循环研究》32: 314 - 322, 1973)来解释。血管内和管腔(腔室)部分都被假定受到时变弹性的影响。等容搏动和等压搏动的时变管腔弹性相似。我们假设血管部分的弹性在这些搏动中也表现相同,因此冠状动脉血流受到类似影响。(摘要截断于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验