Callans D J, Hook B G, Josephson M E
Clinical Electrophysiology Laboratories, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Circulation. 1993 Apr;87(4):1229-38. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.4.1229.
Resetting and entrainment have both been used to characterize the electrophysiological properties of the reentrant circuit in ventricular tachycardia. Several entrainment studies have suggested that the circuit has decremental properties, because the return cycle increases at faster pacing rates. Resetting, however, demonstrates a fully excitable gap in the majority of tachycardias.
The response to resetting and overdrive pacing was analyzed in 18 ventricular tachycardias. Resetting demonstrated some duration of a fully excitable gap in 14 of 18 tachycardias. Overdrive pacing was performed at several cycle lengths with an incremental number of stimuli (1-15 beats) such that the first beat that interacted with the tachycardia (the nth beat) could be identified. The return cycles measured during resetting and the nth beat of pacing were identical (r = 0.99). At relatively long paced cycle lengths, paced beats after the nth beat resulted in a constant return cycle in most tachycardias with a fully excitable gap. At rapid paced cycle lengths, an increase in the return cycle from the nth to the nth + 1 beat was associated with progressive prolongation in the return cycle with each incremental paced beat until a longer equilibrium return cycle was reached or the tachycardia terminated in response to pacing.
We propose that the responses to resetting and overdrive pacing with or without entrainment appear to provide conflicting information about the characteristics of the circuit because they in fact measure entirely different electrophysiological parameters. The nth beat of pacing foreshortens the excitable gap to the extent that it arrives prematurely. Subsequent paced beats interact with an altered tachycardia circuit that has had less time to recover excitability. Resetting is the interaction of a single paced beat with the tachycardia and, as such, provides a more accurate assessment of the characteristics of the unaltered tachycardia circuit.
重置和拖带均已用于表征室性心动过速折返环路的电生理特性。多项拖带研究表明该环路具有递减特性,因为随着起搏频率加快,返回周期会增加。然而,重置显示在大多数心动过速中存在完全可兴奋间隙。
分析了18例室性心动过速对重置和超速起搏的反应。在18例心动过速中的14例中,重置显示出一定时长的完全可兴奋间隙。以递增的刺激次数(1 - 15次搏动)在多个周期长度下进行超速起搏,以便能够识别与心动过速相互作用的第一个搏动(第n个搏动)。在重置期间测量的返回周期与起搏的第n个搏动相同(r = 0.99)。在相对较长的起搏周期长度下,第n个搏动之后的起搏搏动在大多数具有完全可兴奋间隙的心动过速中导致恒定的返回周期。在快速起搏周期长度下,从第n个搏动到第n + 1个搏动的返回周期增加与随着每个递增的起搏搏动返回周期逐渐延长相关,直到达到更长的平衡返回周期或心动过速因起搏而终止。
我们提出,无论是否存在拖带,对重置和超速起搏的反应似乎提供了关于环路特征的相互矛盾的信息,因为它们实际上测量的是完全不同的电生理参数。起搏的第n个搏动会将可兴奋间隙缩短到其过早到达的程度。随后的起搏搏动与一个兴奋性恢复时间较短的改变的心动过速环路相互作用。重置是单个起搏搏动与心动过速的相互作用,因此能更准确地评估未改变的心动过速环路的特征。