Pirela-Cruz M A, Firoozbakhsh K, Moneim M S
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
J Hand Surg Am. 1993 Mar;18(2):299-306. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(93)90365-A.
Five x-ray methods of assessing ulnar translation of the carpus were compared to each other. Overall, we found the uncompensated semiquantitative method proposed by Gilula et al. to be the most practical and the best method with a sensitivity index of 82%, a specificity index of 88%, an accuracy of 87%, and an interobserver correlation of 90%. The method, however, decreased in specificity and accuracy when a corrective formula was applied to adjust the ulnometacarpal angle to zero degrees deviation. Our conclusion is that the sensitivity indices are relatively low for all methods, and underdiagnosis may occur. At present the semiquantitated method of Gilula et al. is the most practical, with the highest sensitivity index, and is recommended as a screening tool for assessment of ulnar translation of the carpus.
对评估腕骨尺侧移位的五种X线方法进行了相互比较。总体而言,我们发现Gilula等人提出的未补偿半定量方法是最实用且最佳的方法,其灵敏度指数为82%,特异度指数为88%,准确率为87%,观察者间相关性为90%。然而,当应用校正公式将尺掌角调整为零偏差时,该方法的特异度和准确率会降低。我们的结论是,所有方法的灵敏度指数相对较低,可能会出现漏诊。目前,Gilula等人的半定量方法是最实用的,灵敏度指数最高,推荐作为评估腕骨尺侧移位的筛查工具。