Suppr超能文献

使用压力校准探针进行根分叉测量的可重复性和有效性。

The reproducibility and validity of furcation measurements using a pressure-calibrated probe.

作者信息

Kim T S, Knittel M, Staehle H J, Eickholz P

机构信息

Poliklinik für Zahnerhaltungskunde, Ruprecht-Karis-Universitt Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 1996 Sep;23(9):826-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb00619.x.

Abstract

The furcation involvement of 100 molars in 25 patients suffering from moderate to advanced periodontitis was investigated. The horizontal probing attachment level (PAL-H) within the furcations was assessed 2x within 2 weeks using the pressure-calibrated (0.25 N) flexible plastic universal explorer version of the TPS probe (TPS). To determine the measurement error of PAL-H assessments, the standard deviation of single measurements was calculated. The measurements were repeated using a colour-coded Nabers probe and compared to the TPS assessments. 253 furcations were evaluated (100 buccal, 47 lingual, 53 mesiolingual and 53 distolingual, respectively). For buccal, lingual, mesiolingual and distolingual furcations, the standard deviations were 0.486 mm, 0.598 mm, 0.846 mm, 1.039 mm, respectively. Measurement error was less in buccal and lingual furcations than in mesiolingual and distolingual sites (p < 0.005). The agreement of replicate measurements of furcation degrees was excellent for buccal and lingual furcations (weighted kappa [standard error] 0.824 [0.076] and 0.779 [0.107], respectively), but only moderate for mesiolingual and distolingual furcations (weighted kappa 0.688 [0.096] and 0.544 [0.101], respectively). Only in distolingual sites there was a significant (p < 0.025; paired t-test) underestimation of PAL-H by the TPS as compared to the Nabers probe. At all locations the TPS underestimated furcation degrees significantly (p < 0.1; Stuart-Maxwell's chi 2) as compared to Nabers probe. Measurement error of mesiolingual and distolingual furcations was significantly higher than of buccal or lingual sites. The reproducibility of PAL-H measurements in furcations using TPS is comparable to data published for scorings with colour-coded Nabers probes. Through and through furcations are likely to be underestimated by using the flexible plastic version of the TPS probe. Hence, it seems to be unsuitable for a proper assessment of the degree of furcation involvement.

摘要

对25例中重度牙周炎患者的100颗磨牙的根分叉病变进行了研究。在2周内使用压力校准(0.25 N)的TPS探针(TPS)的柔性塑料通用探针,在根分叉内评估水平探诊附着水平(PAL-H)2次。为了确定PAL-H评估的测量误差,计算单次测量的标准差。使用颜色编码的Nabers探针重复测量,并与TPS评估结果进行比较。共评估了253个根分叉(分别为100个颊侧、47个舌侧、53个近中舌侧和53个远中舌侧)。颊侧、舌侧、近中舌侧和远中舌侧根分叉的标准差分别为0.486 mm、0.598 mm、0.846 mm、1.039 mm。颊侧和舌侧根分叉的测量误差小于近中舌侧和远中舌侧部位(p < 0.005)。颊侧和舌侧根分叉的根分叉度重复测量的一致性极佳(加权kappa[标准误差]分别为0.824[0.076]和0.779[0.107]),但近中舌侧和远中舌侧根分叉仅为中等(加权kappa分别为0.688[0.096]和0.544[0.101])。仅在远中舌侧部位,与Nabers探针相比,TPS对PAL-H有显著低估(p < 0.025;配对t检验)。在所有部位,与Nabers探针相比,TPS对根分叉度有显著低估(p < 0.1;Stuart-Maxwell卡方检验)。近中舌侧和远中舌侧根分叉的测量误差显著高于颊侧或舌侧部位。使用TPS测量根分叉内PAL-H的可重复性与使用颜色编码的Nabers探针评分公布的数据相当。使用TPS的柔性塑料版本可能会低估贯通性根分叉。因此,它似乎不适用于正确评估根分叉病变的程度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验