Brancati F L, Whelton P K, Whittle J C, Klag M J
Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Baltimore, MD 21287-6231.
Am J Kidney Dis. 1993 Apr;21(4 Suppl 1):15-24. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)80857-2.
Observational epidemiology provides powerful methods for studying the etiology and natural history of renal disease in populations. Existing data sets can be used in the conduct of cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies that complement experimental investigations. Analysis of existing data sets is extremely efficient and, in many instances, provides results of similar quality to those derived from studies that depend on the collection of original data. A study based on linkage of hypertensive end-stage renal disease (ESRD) incidence rates from the Maryland Regional ESRD Registry with corresponding prevalence data from a state-wide survey of cardiovascular risk factors (The Maryland Statewide Household Hypertension Survey) illustrates the power, efficiency, and flexibility of observational epidemiologic methods in investigating racial differences in hypertensive ESRD. Such analyses can both test previously established hypotheses and generate new hypotheses for subsequent investigation.
观察性流行病学为研究人群中肾脏疾病的病因和自然史提供了强有力的方法。现有的数据集可用于开展横断面研究、病例对照研究和队列研究,以补充实验性研究。对现有数据集的分析极为高效,而且在许多情况下,所提供结果的质量与那些依赖原始数据收集的研究所得到的结果相当。一项基于马里兰州区域终末期肾病(ESRD)登记处的高血压终末期肾病发病率与全州心血管危险因素调查(马里兰州全州家庭高血压调查)相应患病率数据进行关联分析的研究,说明了观察性流行病学方法在调查高血压终末期肾病种族差异方面的有效性、效率和灵活性。此类分析既能检验先前确立的假设,又能为后续研究提出新的假设。