Burnett R W
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hartford Hospital, Conn. 06115.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1993 Apr;117(4):365-8.
Materials currently used for blood gas proficiency testing are unlike whole blood in several obvious respects, which by definition introduces matrix effects as possible sources of error that can affect proficiency testing results. Data from recent College of American Pathologists surveys are reviewed and aqueous and fluorocarbon matrices for PO2 and PCO2 testing are compared. Closely related to matrix effects are other sources of error unique to proficiency testing samples, such as sample temperature and sample packaging. Proficiency testing programs are seriously hampered by not being able to use either whole blood or a better surrogate than is currently available. In particular, the use of aqueous materials has the potential to penalize participant laboratories unfairly in some cases and to turn proficiency testing into a meaningless exercise in others.
目前用于血气能力验证测试的材料在几个明显方面与全血不同,根据定义,这会引入基质效应,将其作为可能影响能力验证测试结果的误差来源。回顾了美国病理学家学会近期调查的数据,并比较了用于PO2和PCO2测试的水性和氟碳基质。与基质效应密切相关的是能力验证测试样品特有的其他误差来源,如样品温度和样品包装。由于无法使用全血或比现有材料更好的替代物,能力验证测试计划受到严重阻碍。特别是,在某些情况下,使用水性材料可能会不公平地惩罚参与实验室,而在其他情况下,会使能力验证测试变成毫无意义的活动。