• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

魅力型领导对绩效的影响:多层次关键边界条件探究

The effects of charismatic leadership on performance: exploring key boundary conditions at multilevel.

作者信息

Zhang Linyuan, Seong Jee Young, Hong Doo-Seung, Yoon Hye Jung

机构信息

School of Society and Law, Shandong Women's University, Jinan, Shandong, China.

College of Business and Economics, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 15;16:1487886. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1487886. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1487886
PMID:40302909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12038693/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Charismatic leadership (CL) plays an indispensable role in facilitating organizational change, stimulating creativity, and attaining performance objectives. Given the growing attention on the relationship between CL, creativity and performance, we establish a multilevel model that examines the moderated mediation effect of CL on task performance through creativity. This model considers both individual and group levels while accounting for contextual factors such as high-performance work systems (HPWS) at the individual level and group performance orientation (GPO) at the group level.

METHODS

Our analysis of field data gathered from members of work groups offers robust empirical support for our multilevel framework. Data were collected from team members and their leaders in Korean private-sector organizations, utilizing a final sample of 109 teams consisting of 1,080 members and 109 leaders for our analysis. Conducted ordinary least square (OLS) regression analysis were used to test the hypotheses.

RESULTS

The findings of this study indicate that CL exhibits higher creativity at the individual level when HPWS is low compared to high (). In contrast, CL produces higher group creativity at the group level when GPO is high rather than low (). Additionally, individual-level creativity mediates the relationship between the interaction of CL and HPWS at the individual level and task performance. The influence of the interactive effect of CL and GPO on performance at the group level is mediated by group-level creativity.

CONCLUSION

This study emphasizes the significance of adopting a multilevel interactive perspective on creativity and performance while providing evidence for how leadership and its boundary conditions affect creativity and performance.

摘要

引言

魅力型领导(CL)在推动组织变革、激发创造力和实现绩效目标方面发挥着不可或缺的作用。鉴于对魅力型领导、创造力和绩效之间关系的关注度不断提高,我们建立了一个多层次模型,以检验魅力型领导通过创造力对任务绩效的调节中介效应。该模型在考虑个体层面的高绩效工作系统(HPWS)和群体层面的群体绩效导向(GPO)等情境因素的同时,兼顾了个体和群体层面。

方法

我们对从工作小组成员收集的实地数据进行分析,为我们的多层次框架提供了有力的实证支持。数据是从韩国私营部门组织的团队成员及其领导者那里收集的,我们最终的样本包括109个团队,由1080名成员和109名领导者组成用于分析。进行普通最小二乘法(OLS)回归分析来检验假设。

结果

本研究结果表明,当高绩效工作系统较低时,魅力型领导在个体层面表现出更高的创造力()。相比之下,当群体绩效导向较高而非较低时,魅力型领导在群体层面产生更高的群体创造力()。此外,个体层面的创造力在个体层面魅力型领导与高绩效工作系统的交互作用和任务绩效之间起中介作用。魅力型领导与群体绩效导向在群体层面的交互作用对绩效的影响由群体层面的创造力介导。

结论

本研究强调了对创造力和绩效采用多层次交互视角的重要性,同时为领导力及其边界条件如何影响创造力和绩效提供了证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dde/12038693/13f6e5630714/fpsyg-16-1487886-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dde/12038693/e163fc91827c/fpsyg-16-1487886-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dde/12038693/b0fc12aca258/fpsyg-16-1487886-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dde/12038693/13f6e5630714/fpsyg-16-1487886-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dde/12038693/e163fc91827c/fpsyg-16-1487886-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dde/12038693/b0fc12aca258/fpsyg-16-1487886-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dde/12038693/13f6e5630714/fpsyg-16-1487886-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The effects of charismatic leadership on performance: exploring key boundary conditions at multilevel.魅力型领导对绩效的影响:多层次关键边界条件探究
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 15;16:1487886. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1487886. eCollection 2025.
2
Multilevel homology and discontinuity of person-group fit on individual and team creativity.个人与团队创造力中人际-团队匹配的多层次同源性与不连续性
J Soc Psychol. 2023 Mar 4;163(2):269-286. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.1967844. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
3
High-Performance Work System, Work Well-Being, and Employee Creativity: Cross-Level Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership.高绩效工作系统、工作幸福感与员工创造力:变革型领导的跨层次调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 10;16(9):1640. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091640.
4
Entrepreneurial Team Knowledge Diversity and Creativity: A Multilevel Analysis of Knowledge Sharing, Individual Creativity, and Team Creativity.创业团队知识多样性与创造力:知识共享、个体创造力和团队创造力的多层次分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 1;12:717756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717756. eCollection 2021.
5
How Can Job Crafting Be Reproduced? Examining the Trickle-Down Effect of Job Crafting from Leaders to Employees.工作重塑如何再现?检验工作重塑从领导者到员工的涓滴效应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 31;17(3):894. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030894.
6
Does Paradoxical Leadership Facilitate Leaders' Task Performance? A Perspective of Self-Regulation Theory.矛盾型领导是否有助于领导者的任务绩效?自我调节理论的视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 28;18(7):3505. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073505.
7
Impact of high-performance work systems on individual- and branch-level performance: test of a multilevel model of intermediate linkages.高绩效工作系统对个人和分支机构绩效的影响:中介关系的多层次模型检验。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Mar;97(2):287-300. doi: 10.1037/a0025739. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
8
Humble Leadership, Psychological Safety, Knowledge Sharing, and Follower Creativity: A Cross-Level Investigation.谦逊领导、心理安全、知识共享与下属创造力:一项跨层次研究。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 19;9:1727. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01727. eCollection 2018.
9
The impact of environmentally-specific servant leadership on organizational green performance: The mediating role of green creativity.特定环境下的仆人式领导对组织绿色绩效的影响:绿色创造力的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 11;13:1091025. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1091025. eCollection 2022.
10
The Effect of Downward Social Comparison on Creativity in Organizational Teams, with the Moderation of Narcissism and the Mediation of Negative Affect.下行社会比较对组织团队创造力的影响:自恋的调节作用与消极情绪的中介作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jul 29;13(8):633. doi: 10.3390/bs13080633.

引用本文的文献

1
The end of leadership? Person-group fit as a moderator in the relationship between charismatic leadership and individual outcomes.领导力的终结?个人与群体匹配度在魅力型领导与个体结果关系中的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 2;16:1615936. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1615936. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Multilevel homology and discontinuity of person-group fit on individual and team creativity.个人与团队创造力中人际-团队匹配的多层次同源性与不连续性
J Soc Psychol. 2023 Mar 4;163(2):269-286. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.1967844. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
2
Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions.调节中介假设的处理:理论、方法与建议。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2007 Jan-Mar;42(1):185-227. doi: 10.1080/00273170701341316.
3
Do high-commitment work systems affect creativity? A multilevel combinational approach to employee creativity.
高投入工作系统对创造力有影响吗?员工创造力的多层次组合方法。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Jul;99(4):665-680. doi: 10.1037/a0035679. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
4
What Good Are Positive Emotions?积极情绪有什么好处?
Rev Gen Psychol. 1998 Sep;2(3):300-319. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300.
5
Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: the promise of transformational leadership.管理多样性与提升团队成果:变革型领导的前景
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jan;94(1):77-89. doi: 10.1037/a0013077.
6
The strong situation hypothesis.强情境假设。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2009 Feb;13(1):62-72. doi: 10.1177/1088868308329378.
7
When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator.教育专业化异质性何时与研发团队的创造力相关?变革型领导作为调节变量。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Nov;92(6):1709-21. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1709.
8
An empirical examination of the mechanisms mediating between high-performance work systems and the performance of Japanese organizations.对日本组织中高性能工作系统与组织绩效之间的中介机制进行实证研究。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jul;92(4):1069-83. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1069.
9
The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity.体验到的创造性时间压力与创造力之间的曲线关系:经验开放性和对创造力支持的调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Jul;91(4):963-70. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963.
10
Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing.积极情绪与人类蓬勃发展的复杂动态
Am Psychol. 2005 Oct;60(7):678-86. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.7.678.