Slagter A P, Bosman F, Van der Bilt A
Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Oral Rehabil. 1993 Mar;20(2):159-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1993.tb01599.x.
An experimental artificial test food with low fracture strength (Optocal) was compared with Optosil with respect to the comminution during mastication by complete denture wearers and subjects with natural dentitions. The comminution of both test foods revealed large differences between the denture wearers and the dentate subjects. These differences were larger with Optosil than with Optocal. The differences in comminution between Optocal and Optosil were larger in the denture wearers than in the dentate subjects. The differences in comminution between the denture wearers and the dentate subjects as well as the differences in comminution between Optocal and Optosil within each group were largely established in less than 20 chewing strokes. The results indicate that differences in selection contributed substantially to the differences in comminution. Since Optocal appeared to be much easier to chew than Optosil, it may be preferred to Optosil for measuring masticatory performance in complete denture wearers.
将一种具有低断裂强度的实验性人工测试食品(Optocal)与Optosil进行比较,观察全口义齿佩戴者和天然牙列受试者咀嚼时的粉碎情况。两种测试食品的粉碎情况在义齿佩戴者和有牙受试者之间显示出很大差异。Optosil的这些差异比Optocal更大。Optocal和Optosil之间的粉碎差异在义齿佩戴者中比在有牙受试者中更大。义齿佩戴者和有牙受试者之间的粉碎差异以及每组中Optocal和Optosil之间的粉碎差异在不到20次咀嚼冲程内基本确定。结果表明,选择上的差异在很大程度上导致了粉碎差异。由于Optocal似乎比Optosil更容易咀嚼,在测量全口义齿佩戴者的咀嚼性能时,它可能比Optosil更受青睐。