Selfridge J, Shea S S
J Emerg Nurs. 1993 Apr;19(2):127-30.
To evaluate the accuracy of fever detection using the tympanic membrane thermometer in infants age 3 months and younger in a general ED clinical setting.
Retrospective analysis of sequential tympanic and rectal temperature readings for sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.
One hundred two infants, aged 3 months and younger, coming to the emergency department from January 1991 to July 1991.
With fever defined as a temperature of 99.6 degrees F or greater by tympanic thermometer or 100.6 degrees F or greater by rectal thermometer, the tympanic thermometer had an overall specificity for fever detection of 88%. Sensitivity was 90% or higher in the 2-month-old and younger age groups and 66% in the 3-month-old age group. Negative predictive values were 90% and greater and positive predictive values ranged from 60% to 66%.
The tympanic membrane thermometer provided a reliable temperature reading in a high percentage of the sample population when the infant was afebrile. It was less reliable in detecting the presence of fever in this same age group. Febrile temperature readings obtained by the tympanic membrane thermometer within this age group may need to be compared with a rectal mode reading to accurately determine the presence of fever.
评估在普通急诊科临床环境中,使用鼓膜温度计检测3个月及以下婴儿发热情况的准确性。
对鼓膜温度和直肠温度的连续读数进行回顾性分析,以确定敏感性、特异性和预测值。
1991年1月至1991年7月期间到急诊科就诊的102名3个月及以下婴儿。
将发热定义为鼓膜温度计测量温度达到或高于99.6华氏度,或直肠温度计测量温度达到或高于100.6华氏度时,鼓膜温度计检测发热的总体特异性为88%。2个月及以下年龄组的敏感性为90%或更高,3个月年龄组的敏感性为66%。阴性预测值为90%及以上,阳性预测值在60%至66%之间。
当婴儿不发热时,鼓膜温度计在大部分样本人群中能提供可靠的体温读数。在检测同一年龄组的发热情况时,其可靠性较低。在该年龄组中,通过鼓膜温度计获得的发热体温读数可能需要与直肠测量读数进行比较,以准确确定是否发热。