Suppr超能文献

食管癌和贲门癌的分期:不同分期标准的比较。

Staging of carcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: a comparison of different staging criteria.

作者信息

Ellis F H, Watkins E, Krasna M J, Heatley G J, Balogh K

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New England Deaconess Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02215.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 1993 Apr;52(4):231-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930520406.

Abstract

The third edition [1988] of the Manual for Staging of Cancer of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) was developed to permit finer discrimination between stages than was true of the previous edition [1983]. This study was designed to determine whether or not this goal was achieved. Pathologic staging of the specimens removed from 265 patients with carcinoma of the esophagus or cardia undergoing esophagogastrectomy between 1970 and 1988 was performed according to criteria published in the second and third editions and their survival data compared. The new staging criteria of the AJCC provides no better discrimination of stages according to survival than was true of the earlier version, the 5-year survival of stage IIA patients being similar to that of stage I patients (37.5 +/- 6.7% vs. 50.8 +/- 17.7%), and the survival of stage IIB patients being similar to that of stage III patients (16.2 +/- 8.1% vs. 13.6 +/- 3.7%). However, depth of wall penetration and extent of lymph node involvement were reliable independent predictors of survival. We propose a modified version of the Skinner WNM staging plan that provides a modest increase in staging fragmentation.

摘要

美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)《癌症分期手册》第三版(1988年)旨在实现比上一版(1983年)更精细的分期区分。本研究旨在确定这一目标是否达成。根据第二版和第三版公布的标准,对1970年至1988年间接受食管胃切除术的265例食管癌或贲门癌患者切除标本进行病理分期,并比较其生存数据。AJCC的新分期标准在根据生存情况区分阶段方面并不比早期版本更好,IIA期患者的5年生存率与I期患者相似(37.5±6.7%对50.8±17.7%),IIB期患者的生存率与III期患者相似(16.2±8.1%对13.6±3.7%)。然而,壁层浸润深度和淋巴结受累范围是可靠的生存独立预测因素。我们提出了一个改良版的斯金纳WNM分期方案,该方案在分期细化方面有适度增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验