• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证第七版美国癌症联合委员会肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(AJCC TNM)分期在 II 期和 III 期结直肠癌患者中的应用:来自韩国某医疗中心的 2511 例病例分析。

Validation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis (AJCC TNM) staging in patients with stage II and stage III colorectal carcinoma: analysis of 2511 cases from a medical centre in Korea.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2011 Aug;13(8):e220-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02625.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02625.x
PMID:21689314
Abstract

AIM

The sixth and seventh editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system for patients with stage II and stage III colorectal carcinoma (AJCC-6 and AJCC-7) were compared.

METHOD

Between 2000 and 2007, 2511 stage II/III colorectal carcinoma patients received primary surgical resection at the Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea). All patients were staged using AJCC-6 and AJCC-7 TNM systems. Patients with synchronous or other cancers, those given preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy and those in whom fewer than 12 lymph nodes were resected, were excluded. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared.

RESULTS

Of 2511 patients, 255 (10.2%) had different stages in the AJCC-6 and AJCC-7. For the AJCC-7, the 5-year OS by stage was 94.2% for stage IIA, 88.8% for stage IIB, 83.5% for stage IIC, 91.8% for stage IIIA, 81.8% for stage IIIB and 72.0% for stage IIIC. The OS and the DFS were not significantly different for the new substages IIB (n = 57) and IIC (n = 34) (P = 0.34 and P = 0.87, respectively). For the 187 patients with stage T3N2a cancer, the OS and the DFS were significantly different from stage IIIB other than T3N2a (P = 0.008 and P = 0.01, respectively) and there were no statistically significant differences in OS between the T3N2a group and the IIIC group (P = 0.46).

CONCLUSION

The study indicates that AJCC-7 has better prognostic validity than AJCC-6 for staging of patients with stage II and stage III colorectal carcinoma.

摘要

目的

比较第 6 版和第 7 版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)分期系统在 II 期和 III 期结直肠癌患者中的应用(AJCC-6 和 AJCC-7)。

方法

2000 年至 2007 年,2511 例 II/III 期结直肠癌患者在韩国首尔的 Asan 医疗中心接受了根治性手术。所有患者均采用 AJCC-6 和 AJCC-7 TNM 系统分期。排除同时性或其他部位癌症、术前化疗或放疗以及淋巴结切除少于 12 枚的患者。比较总生存(OS)和无病生存(DFS)。

结果

2511 例患者中,255 例(10.2%)在 AJCC-6 和 AJCC-7 中的分期不同。对于 AJCC-7,按分期的 5 年 OS 为 IIA 期 94.2%、IIB 期 88.8%、IIC 期 83.5%、IIIA 期 91.8%、IIIB 期 81.8%和 IIIC 期 72.0%。新亚分期 IIB(n = 57)和 IIC(n = 34)之间的 OS 和 DFS 差异无统计学意义(P = 0.34 和 P = 0.87)。对于 187 例 T3N2a 期癌症患者,与 T3N2a 以外的 IIIB 期相比,OS 和 DFS 差异有统计学意义(P = 0.008 和 P = 0.01),T3N2a 组与 IIIC 组之间 OS 差异无统计学意义(P = 0.46)。

结论

该研究表明,与 AJCC-6 相比,AJCC-7 对 II 期和 III 期结直肠癌患者的分期具有更好的预后价值。

相似文献

1
Validation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis (AJCC TNM) staging in patients with stage II and stage III colorectal carcinoma: analysis of 2511 cases from a medical centre in Korea.验证第七版美国癌症联合委员会肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(AJCC TNM)分期在 II 期和 III 期结直肠癌患者中的应用:来自韩国某医疗中心的 2511 例病例分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Aug;13(8):e220-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02625.x.
2
Prognostic value of the 2002 TNM classification for breast carcinoma with regard to the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes.2002年TNM分类对伴有腋窝淋巴结转移数目之乳腺癌的预后价值。
Cancer. 2005 Aug 15;104(4):700-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21199.
3
Treatment of maxillary sinus carcinoma: a comparison of the 1997 and 1977 American Joint Committee on cancer staging systems.上颌窦癌的治疗:1997年与1977年美国癌症联合委员会分期系统的比较
Cancer. 1999 Nov 1;86(9):1700-11.
4
Metastatic lymph node size and colorectal cancer prognosis.转移性淋巴结大小与结直肠癌预后
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Jan;200(1):20-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.09.037.
5
Prediction of prognosis is not improved by the seventh and latest edition of the TNM classification for colorectal cancer in a single-center collective.在单中心研究中,第七版最新版结直肠癌 TNM 分类未能改善预后预测。
Ann Surg. 2011 Nov;254(5):793-800; discussion 800-1. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182369101.
6
Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging system in patients with resected esophageal carcinoma.比较第 6 版和第 7 版美国癌症联合委员会肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期系统在食管癌切除患者中的应用。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Apr;89(4):1024-31. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.01.017.
7
Survival rates of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma with the new AJCC staging system.采用新美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统的鼻窦鳞状细胞癌生存率。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Feb;133(2):131-4. doi: 10.1001/archotol.133.2.131.
8
Validation of seventh edition AJCC gastric cancer staging modifications.第七版 AJCC 胃癌分期修改的验证。
J Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;105(1):26-30. doi: 10.1002/jso.22026. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
9
Outcomes of liver transplantation in 490 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: validation of a uniform staging after surgical treatment.490例肝细胞癌患者肝移植的结果:手术治疗后统一分期的验证
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 May;204(5):1016-27; discussion 1027-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.12.043.
10
[Preliminary experience of clinical applications of the 7th UICC-AJCC TNM staging system of esophageal carcinoma].[国际抗癌联盟(UICC)-美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第7版食管癌TNM分期系统的临床应用初步经验]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Jun;34(6):461-4. doi: 10. 3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.06.013.

引用本文的文献

1
A retrospective study analyzing if lymph node ratio carbon nanoparticles predict stage III rectal cancer recurrence.一项回顾性研究,分析淋巴结碳纳米颗粒比率是否可预测III期直肠癌复发。
Front Oncol. 2023 Oct 30;13:1238300. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1238300. eCollection 2023.
2
Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for rectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection.开发和验证用于接受手术切除的直肠癌患者的预后列线图。
Pathol Oncol Res. 2023 Apr 19;29:1611014. doi: 10.3389/pore.2023.1611014. eCollection 2023.
3
The association between lifestyle-related risk factors and survival in patients with colorectal cancer in an urban South African cohort.
在南非城市队列中,与生活方式相关的风险因素与结直肠癌患者的生存之间的关联。
Afr Health Sci. 2022 Mar;22(1):312-321. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v22i1.38.
4
The prognostic significance of different proportion of signet-ring cells of colorectal carcinoma.结直肠癌中不同比例印戒细胞的预后意义。
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2022 Feb 1;22(1):124-130. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2021.5856.
5
Proposal of a modified subclassification system for stage III colorectal cancer: A multi-institutional retrospective analysis.III期结直肠癌改良亚分类系统的提议:一项多机构回顾性分析
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020 Jul 23;4(6):667-675. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12375. eCollection 2020 Nov.
6
Construction of an Immunogenomic Risk Score for Prognostication in Colon Cancer.用于结肠癌预后评估的免疫基因组风险评分构建
Front Genet. 2020 May 21;11:499. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00499. eCollection 2020.
7
Prognostic evaluation of resectable colorectal cancer using platelet-associated indicators.使用血小板相关指标对可切除结直肠癌进行预后评估。
Oncol Lett. 2019 Jul;18(1):571-580. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10388. Epub 2019 May 21.
8
Identification of genes that predict the biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.预测前列腺癌生化复发的基因鉴定。
Oncol Lett. 2018 Sep;16(3):3447-3452. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9106. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
9
Impact of Preoperative Anemia on Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery.术前贫血对择期结直肠手术患者围手术期结局的影响。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018 May 8;2018:2417028. doi: 10.1155/2018/2417028. eCollection 2018.
10
The family of apoptosis-stimulating proteins of p53 is dysregulated in colorectal cancer patients.p53凋亡刺激蛋白家族在结直肠癌患者中表达失调。
Oncol Lett. 2018 May;15(5):6409-6417. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8151. Epub 2018 Mar 1.