Cipoletti R D, Moneim M S, Greene E R
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico Medical Center, Albuquerque 87131.
Microsurgery. 1993;14(2):107-13. doi: 10.1002/micr.1920140205.
Twenty-four femoral arteries in 12 rats were used to compare longitudinal and transverse closures in blood vessels approximately 1 mm in diameter. The closure techniques were applied to a simple longitudinal slit, 1 mm long, and to a longitudinal defect, 0.5 mm wide and 1 mm long. Comparisons were made of the change in pre- and postrepair flow velocities, recorded every 5 min using a 20-MHz pulsed Doppler velocimeter. Maximum reductions in flow velocity (linearly related to volume flow) were 10% and 29% for the longitudinal and transverse repairs, respectively, when applied to the longitudinal slit, and 65% and 19%, respectively, when applied to the larger arteriotomy. An analysis of variance indicates that the differences in the normalization of flow velocities during the immediate postrepair period are significant (P < 0.05). We conclude that optimal flow normalization is achieved by applying the longitudinal repair to the simple slit and the transverse repair to the larger arteriotomy.
在12只大鼠身上选取24条股动脉,用于比较直径约1毫米血管的纵向和横向闭合情况。闭合技术应用于一个1毫米长的简单纵向切口以及一个宽0.5毫米、长1毫米的纵向缺损处。使用20兆赫脉冲多普勒测速仪每5分钟记录一次修复前后的血流速度变化,并进行比较。当应用于纵向切口时,纵向和横向修复的血流速度最大降幅(与体积流量呈线性相关)分别为10%和29%;当应用于较大的动脉切口时,分别为65%和19%。方差分析表明,修复后即刻期间血流速度正常化的差异具有显著性(P<0.05)。我们得出结论,将纵向修复应用于简单切口,横向修复应用于较大的动脉切口可实现最佳的血流正常化。