Culasso F, Lenzi A, Gandini L, Lombardo F, Dondero F
Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome La Sapienza, Italy.
Arch Androl. 1993 Mar-Apr;30(2):105-10. doi: 10.3109/01485019308987742.
Results are reported of a statistical evaluation of the variables obtained by standard microscopic semen analysis and by computer-assisted sperm motility analysis. Descriptive statistical analysis and cluster analysis were carried out on both sets of data. A contingency table was created to compare the classifications obtained by the two clustering procedures. A canonical correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the classification power of the variables obtained by the two semen analyses. The results show that the two techniques of semen analysis are complementary and not substitutive and that the correlated variables "percentage forward motility" and "sperm velocity" are the most discriminating.
报告了对通过标准显微镜精液分析和计算机辅助精子活力分析获得的变量进行统计评估的结果。对两组数据都进行了描述性统计分析和聚类分析。创建了一个列联表来比较两种聚类程序获得的分类。进行了典型相关分析,以评估两种精液分析获得的变量的分类能力。结果表明,两种精液分析技术是互补的而非替代的,并且相关变量“前向运动百分比”和“精子速度”是最具区分性的。