Suppr超能文献

胰腺癌中肿瘤标志物癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原50(CA 50)和糖类抗原242(CA 242)的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析;一项前瞻性研究的结果

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the tumour markers CEA, CA 50 and CA 242 in pancreatic cancer; results from a prospective study.

作者信息

Pasanen P A, Eskelinen M, Partanen K, Pikkarainen P, Penttilä I, Alhava E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 1993 Apr;67(4):852-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1993.156.

Abstract

The serum values of the tumour markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer-associated carboanhydrate antigens CA 50 and CA 242 were evaluated in 193 patients with hepatopancreato-biliary diseases by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis in order to compare their diagnostic accuracy in pancreatic cancer (n = 26), and to define optimal cut-off levels for the serum values of these tumour markers in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. The ROC analysis showed that all marker tests are considerably sensitive (77-81%) at the specificity level of 80%. The CA 242 test was more sensitive than CEA and CA 50 at high specificity levels (> 0.90) but slightly less sensitive at low specificity levels (< 0.60). The CEA test and CA 50 test performed equally well at high and low specificity levels. According to this study, it would seem optimal to use the cut-off level of 4.1 ng ml-1 for CEA, and the level of 137 U ml-1 for CA 50, since they gave a sensitivity of 77% at the specificity levels of 83% and 84%, respectively. For CA 242 the optimal cut-off level was 21 U ml-1, which gave a sensitivity and specificity of 81%. In conclusion, the results of ROC curve analysis suggest that the CA 242 test has an advantage over CEA and CA 50 because of its higher specificity in pancreatic cancer. In addition, it would seem reasonable to use higher cut-off values than what has been recommended for CEA and CA 50 in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, but for CA 242 the recommended cut-off level of 20 U ml-1 seems appropriate.

摘要

通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,对193例肝胰胆疾病患者的肿瘤标志物癌胚抗原(CEA)、癌相关碳水化合物抗原CA 50和CA 242的血清值进行了评估,以比较它们在胰腺癌(n = 26)中的诊断准确性,并确定这些肿瘤标志物血清值在胰腺癌诊断中的最佳临界值。ROC分析表明,在特异性水平为80%时,所有标志物检测的敏感性都相当高(77 - 81%)。在高特异性水平(> 0.90)时,CA 242检测比CEA和CA 50更敏感,但在低特异性水平(< 0.60)时敏感性略低。CEA检测和CA 50检测在高、低特异性水平下表现相当。根据这项研究,CEA的最佳临界值为4.1 ng/ml,CA 50的临界值为137 U/ml,似乎是最佳选择,因为它们在特异性水平分别为83%和84%时,敏感性为77%。对于CA 242,最佳临界值为21 U/ml,其敏感性和特异性为81%。总之,ROC曲线分析结果表明,CA 242检测在胰腺癌诊断中比CEA和CA 50具有更高的特异性。此外,在胰腺癌诊断中使用比CEA和CA 50推荐值更高的临界值似乎是合理的,但对于CA 242,推荐的临界值20 U/ml似乎是合适的。

相似文献

7
Tumor markers in pancreatic cancer: a comparative clinical study between CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 50.
Int J Biol Markers. 1990 Jul-Sep;5(3):127-32. doi: 10.1177/172460089000500305.

引用本文的文献

2
Advances in biomarker research for pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌生物标志物研究进展。
Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(17):2439-51. doi: 10.2174/13816128112092439.
3
Evaluation of CA 242 as a tumor marker in gallbladder cancer.CA 242作为胆囊癌肿瘤标志物的评估
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2012 Jun;43(2):267-71. doi: 10.1007/s12029-011-9288-7.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验