• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快速膜翅目毒液免疫疗法:三种方案的安全性比较

Rapid Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy: comparative safety of three protocols.

作者信息

Birnbaum J, Charpin D, Vervloet D

机构信息

Department of Chest Diseases and Allergy, Hôpital Sainte-Marguerite, Marseille, France.

出版信息

Clin Exp Allergy. 1993 Mar;23(3):226-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1993.tb00886.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2222.1993.tb00886.x
PMID:8472191
Abstract

We compared 284 sting-allergic patients treated with either a 4 day (group 1), 6 hr (group 2) or 210 min (group 3) rapid venom immunotherapy (RVIT) protocol using honey bee (HB) or yellow jacket (YJ) venom at cumulative doses of 527.6 micrograms, 226.6 micrograms and 101.1 micrograms respectively. The 4 day protocol involved four times as many injections as the 210 min protocol and twice as many as the 6 hr protocol. Desensitization was conducted in a hospital providing full emergency resuscitation facilities. In group 1, 1 x 100 micrograms boosters were given on days 7, 10, 15 and 45 and, in groups 2 and 3, 2 x 50 micrograms boosters were given on day 15 and 1 x 100 micrograms on day 45. The patients in the three groups were comparable with regard to clinical characteristics and immunological reactivity determined by skin tests. All patients had large local reactions. Systemic reactions (SR) occurred in 28.2% of patients in group 1, 28.6% in group 2 and 6.9% in group 3. The mean total cumulative venom dose (s.e.m.) for occurrence of SR was 123.75 (+/- 24.2) in group 1, 183.27 (+/- 28.5) in group 2, and 36.43 (+/- 9.3) in group 3. HB led to more systemic reactions than YJ venom. The rate of SR decreased when the cumulative venom dose was reduced during RVIT. The median dose was 137.6 micrograms in group 1, 226.6 micrograms in group 2, and 21.1 micrograms in group 3. No systemic reactions were observed after the booster injections. The results of this study suggest that short RVIT protocols with low cumulative doses carry a lesser risk of SR.

摘要

我们比较了284例蜂蜇过敏患者,他们分别接受了4天(第1组)、6小时(第2组)或210分钟(第3组)的快速毒液免疫疗法(RVIT)方案,使用的是蜜蜂(HB)或黄蜂(YJ)毒液,累积剂量分别为527.6微克、226.6微克和101.1微克。4天方案的注射次数是210分钟方案的四倍,是6小时方案的两倍。脱敏治疗在一家具备全面紧急复苏设施的医院进行。在第1组中,在第7天、第10天、第15天和第45天给予1×100微克的加强注射,在第2组和第3组中,在第15天给予2×50微克的加强注射,在第45天给予1×100微克的加强注射。三组患者在临床特征和通过皮肤试验测定的免疫反应性方面具有可比性。所有患者均出现严重局部反应。全身反应(SR)在第1组患者中的发生率为28.2%,在第2组为28.6%,在第3组为6.9%。发生全身反应时的平均总累积毒液剂量(标准误)在第1组为123.75(±24.2),在第2组为183.27(±28.5),在第3组为36.43(±9.3)。与黄蜂毒液相比,蜜蜂毒液导致更多的全身反应。在RVIT期间降低累积毒液剂量时,全身反应的发生率降低。第1组的中位剂量为137.6微克,第2组为226.6微克,第3组为21.1微克。加强注射后未观察到全身反应。本研究结果表明,累积剂量低的短RVIT方案发生全身反应的风险较小。

相似文献

1
Rapid Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy: comparative safety of three protocols.快速膜翅目毒液免疫疗法:三种方案的安全性比较
Clin Exp Allergy. 1993 Mar;23(3):226-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1993.tb00886.x.
2
Venom immunotherapy: tolerance to a 3-day protocol of rush-immunotherapy.毒液免疫疗法:对3天快速免疫疗法方案的耐受性
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1995 Nov-Dec;23(6):277-84.
3
Clinical and immunologic studies of rapid venom immunotherapy in Hymenoptera-sensitive patients.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1989 Dec;84(6 Pt 1):951-9. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(89)90394-1.
4
Rush Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy: a safe and practical protocol for high-risk patients.拉什膜翅目昆虫毒液免疫疗法:一种针对高危患者的安全实用方案。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Dec;110(6):928-33. doi: 10.1067/mai.2002.129124.
5
Maintenance venom immunotherapy administered at 3-month intervals is both safe and efficacious.每3个月进行一次的维持性毒液免疫疗法既安全又有效。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 May;107(5):902-6. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.114986.
6
Rapid venom immunotherapy is safe for routine use in the treatment of patients with Hymenoptera anaphylaxis.快速毒液免疫疗法在治疗膜翅目过敏患者中常规使用是安全的。
Ann Allergy. 1994 Nov;73(5):423-8.
7
[Immunotherapy against hymenoptera venom: report of ten patients].[针对膜翅目毒液的免疫疗法:十例患者报告]
Rev Med Chil. 2007 Dec;135(12):1566-71. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
8
Rush hymenoptera venom immunotherapy is efficacious and safe.速发型膜翅目毒液免疫疗法有效且安全。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2006;16(4):232-8.
9
Comparison of the Safety Profiles of 3 Different Hymenoptera Venom Immunotherapy Protocols: A Retrospective 2-Center Study of 143 Patients.比较 3 种不同膜翅目毒液免疫治疗方案的安全性特征:对 143 例患者的回顾性 2 中心研究。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2020;181(10):783-789. doi: 10.1159/000509187. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
10
[Accelerated desensitization for hymenoptera venom allergy in 30 hours: efficacy and safety in 150 cases].30小时内完成膜翅目毒液过敏的加速脱敏:150例患者的疗效与安全性
Rev Med Brux. 1997 Jun;18(3):120-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosis and treatment of venom allergy in adults: A single-center experience in Lithuania.成人毒液过敏的诊断与治疗:立陶宛的单中心经验
World Allergy Organ J. 2024 Mar 7;17(3):100884. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100884. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Diagnosis and Management of Insect Allergy: Barriers and Facilitators in the United States.昆虫过敏的诊断与管理:美国的障碍与促进因素
J Asthma Allergy. 2022 Dec 15;15:1773-1781. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S364867. eCollection 2022.
3
Venom Immunotherapy: From Proteins to Product to Patient Protection.
毒液免疫疗法:从蛋白质到产品再到患者保护。
Toxins (Basel). 2021 Sep 1;13(9):616. doi: 10.3390/toxins13090616.
4
Systemic reactions to subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy: real-world cause and effect modelling.皮下过敏原免疫疗法的全身反应:真实世界的因果建模
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2021 Jul 6;17(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13223-021-00566-x.
5
Safety and tolerability of venom immunotherapy: Evaluation of 581 rush- and ultra-rush induction protocols (safety of rush and ultra-rush venom immunotherapy).毒液免疫疗法的安全性和耐受性:581种快速和超快速诱导方案的评估(快速和超快速毒液免疫疗法的安全性)
World Allergy Organ J. 2020 Dec 15;14(1):100496. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100496. eCollection 2021 Jan.
6
EAACI Allergen Immunotherapy User's Guide.EAACI 过敏原免疫治疗用户指南。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2020 May;31 Suppl 25(Suppl 25):1-101. doi: 10.1111/pai.13189.
7
Clinical Utility of Rush Venom Immunotherapy: Current Status.速发型毒液免疫疗法的临床应用:现状
J Asthma Allergy. 2020 Jan 7;13:1-10. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S200917. eCollection 2020.
8
Stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy.蜂蜇昆虫过敏:毒液免疫疗法的当前观点
J Asthma Allergy. 2015 Jul 23;8:75-86. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S62288. eCollection 2015.
9
Risk associated with bee venom therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.蜂毒疗法相关风险:系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 May 21;10(5):e0126971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126971. eCollection 2015.
10
Implementing specific oral tolerance induction to milk into routine clinical practice: experience from first 50 patients.将针对牛奶的特异性口服免疫耐受诱导纳入常规临床实践:50 例患者的初步经验。
J Asthma Allergy. 2014 Jan 28;7:1-9. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S53281. eCollection 2014.