• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同信号持续时间对人类和猴子纯音频率辨别能力的影响。

Effects of varying signal duration on pure-tone frequency discrimination in humans and monkeys.

作者信息

Sinnott J M, Brown C H

机构信息

Psychology Department, University of South Alabama, Mobile 36688.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Mar;93(3):1541-6. doi: 10.1121/1.406812.

DOI:10.1121/1.406812
PMID:8473607
Abstract

This study examined the effects of varying signal duration and pulse repetition rate on pure tone frequency difference limens (FDLs) at 500 Hz and 4 kHz in humans and monkeys. Two experiments examined FDLs as a function of tone duration from 12-400 ms, using stimuli presented either with a constant pulse rate, or with a constant interstimulus interval. In both cases, at 500 Hz, human FDLs increased more than monkey FDLs as duration decreased from 400 to 12 ms. This effect resulted in monkey FDLs that were about 14 times larger than human FDLs at 400 ms, but only about 4 times larger at 12 ms. At 4 kHz, human and monkey FDLs showed more similar rates of increase as duration decreased. A third experiment examined FDLs at 500 Hz for a 100-ms tone as a function of pulse rate (1 per 250-2000 ms). Here, FDLs for humans and monkeys varied in a similar fashion, indicating that both species' sensitivity was similarly affected by manipulating temporal variables relating to memory load, rather than sensory coding. These data provide evidence that, at 500 Hz, humans have a qualitatively different pure tone frequency analyzing mechanism from monkeys, possibly based on better access to phase-locking mechanisms.

摘要

本研究考察了不同信号持续时间和脉冲重复率对人类和猴子在500赫兹和4千赫兹时纯音频率辨别阈限(FDLs)的影响。两项实验考察了FDLs作为音调持续时间(12 - 400毫秒)的函数,使用以恒定脉冲率或恒定刺激间隔呈现的刺激。在这两种情况下,在500赫兹时,当持续时间从400毫秒减少到12毫秒时,人类的FDLs比猴子的FDLs增加得更多。这种效应导致在400毫秒时猴子的FDLs比人类的FDLs大约大14倍,但在12毫秒时仅大约大4倍。在4千赫兹时,随着持续时间的减少,人类和猴子的FDLs显示出更相似的增加速率。第三个实验考察了在500赫兹时100毫秒音调的FDLs作为脉冲率(每250 - 2000毫秒1次)的函数。在这里,人类和猴子的FDLs以相似的方式变化,表明通过操纵与记忆负荷相关的时间变量,而不是感觉编码,两个物种的敏感性受到相似的影响。这些数据提供了证据,即在500赫兹时,人类与猴子在纯音频率分析机制上存在质的差异,这可能基于对锁相机制更好的利用。

相似文献

1
Effects of varying signal duration on pure-tone frequency discrimination in humans and monkeys.不同信号持续时间对人类和猴子纯音频率辨别能力的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Mar;93(3):1541-6. doi: 10.1121/1.406812.
2
Effects of varying signal and noise levels on pure-tone frequency discrimination in humans and monkeys.不同信号和噪声水平对人类和猴子纯音频率辨别能力的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Mar;93(3):1535-40. doi: 10.1121/1.406811.
3
Frequency difference limens of pure tones and harmonics within complex stimuli in Mongolian gerbils and humans.蒙古沙鼠和人类对复杂刺激中纯音及谐波的频率差异阈限
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jan;125(1):304-14. doi: 10.1121/1.3021315.
4
Mistuning detection and onset asynchrony in harmonic complexes in Mongolian gerbils.蒙古沙鼠复调中的失谐检测和起始异步。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jul;128(1):280-90. doi: 10.1121/1.3436552.
5
The role of excitation-pattern cues and temporal cues in the frequency and modulation-rate discrimination of amplitude-modulated tones.激发模式线索和时间线索在调幅音频率和调制率辨别中的作用。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Aug;104(2 Pt 1):1039-50. doi: 10.1121/1.423322.
6
Frequency and intensity discrimination in humans and monkeys.人类和猴子的频率与强度辨别
J Acoust Soc Am. 1985 Dec;78(6):1977-85. doi: 10.1121/1.392654.
7
Frequency discrimination in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): effects of tone duration and tonal context.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 May;107(5 Pt 1):2657-64. doi: 10.1121/1.428651.
8
Frequency discrimination duration effects for Huggins pitch and narrowband noise (L).频率辨别持续时间对哈金斯音高和窄带噪声(L)的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jan;129(1):1-4. doi: 10.1121/1.3518745.
9
Comparisons in Frequency Difference Limens Between Sequential and Simultaneous Listening Conditions in Normal-Hearing Listeners.正常听力者在顺序和同时聆听条件下的频率差阈比较。
Am J Audiol. 2021 Jun 14;30(2):266-274. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-20-00134. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
10
Effect of duration on the frequency discrimination of individual partials in a complex tone and on the discrimination of fundamental frequency.时长对复合音中各个分音频率辨别以及基频辨别的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Jan;121(1):373-82. doi: 10.1121/1.2382476.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of nonhuman primates in studies of noise injury and treatment.在噪声损伤和治疗研究中使用非人类灵长类动物。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Nov;146(5):3770. doi: 10.1121/1.5132709.
2
Amplitude modulation detection as a function of modulation frequency and stimulus duration: comparisons between macaques and humans.调幅检测随调制频率和刺激持续时间的变化:猕猴与人类的比较。
Hear Res. 2011 Jul;277(1-2):37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.03.014. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
3
Temporal summation of 500-Hz tones and octave-band noise bursts in infants and adults.
婴儿和成人中500赫兹纯音及倍频程带噪声脉冲的时间总和。
Percept Psychophys. 1995 Feb;57(2):183-90. doi: 10.3758/bf03206504.