Steere J, Cooper P J
Department of Psychology, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
Int J Eat Disord. 1993 Mar;13(2):211-9. doi: 10.1002/1098-108x(199303)13:2<211::aid-eat2260130209>3.0.co;2-q.
In this study a comparison was made between the amounts eaten by restrained and unrestrained eaters following an anxiety-induction procedure. Subjects' level of perceived hunger was assessed and the interactive effects on eating of anxiety and perceived hunger were examined. Results revealed a significant three-way interaction. Unrestrained subjects did not alter their eating in response to either anxiety or hunger. When relaxed, restrained subjects ate more when hungry than when not hungry. However, in restrained subjects, anxiety appeared to counteract the disinhibiting effect of hunger, so that anxious hungry subjects ate less than relaxed hungry subjects and the same amount as relaxed subjects who were not hungry.
在本研究中，对接受焦虑诱导程序后，节食者和非节食者的进食量进行了比较。评估了受试者的饥饿感水平，并研究了焦虑和饥饿感对进食的交互作用。结果显示存在显著的三因素交互作用。非节食者不会因焦虑或饥饿而改变进食量。放松状态下，节食者饥饿时比不饥饿时吃得更多。然而，对于节食者而言，焦虑似乎抵消了饥饿的去抑制作用，因此焦虑饥饿的节食者比放松饥饿的节食者吃得少，且与不饥饿的放松节食者进食量相同。
