• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comments on erroneous interpretations of Freud's seduction theory.

作者信息

Eissler K R

出版信息

J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1993;41(2):571-83. doi: 10.1177/000306519304100211.

DOI:10.1177/000306519304100211
PMID:8478522
Abstract

The seduction theory, as formulated by Freud in 1896, has been erroneously understood by many to be a statement about the frequency of sexual abuse of children, but in reality it postulates a specific etiology of adult psychopathology. Freud stated two conditions that would falsify the theory. When he discovered their existence, he was forced, very much against his preference, to abandon the theory. Later, this sequence was denied and Freud's change of theory was referred to opprobrious subjective traits, assertions made without documentation except by Masson. He maintained that he had come across a document from the pen of Ruth Mack Brunswick the alleged content of which implied grave deficits in Freud's scholarship. When it became possible to examine the original document, it was found that it does not contain anything corresponding to what Masson reported. The discrepancies between his account and Mack Brunswick's draft are presented. In the document, Mack Brunswick set forth some of the observations she had made when treating the Wolf Man in the years subsequent to the patient's first analysis, which she had reported in 1928. Her enlargement of the role of seduction in the etiology of the Wolf Man's psychopathology is discussed.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comments on erroneous interpretations of Freud's seduction theory.
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1993;41(2):571-83. doi: 10.1177/000306519304100211.
2
[Remarks on false interpretations of Freud's seduction theory].[关于对弗洛伊德诱奸理论的错误解读的评论]
Psyche (Stuttg). 1993 Sep;47(9):855-65.
3
Freud's retraction of his seduction theory and the Schreber case.
Psychoanal Rev. 1989 Summer;76(2):185-201.
4
Freud's seduction theory.弗洛伊德的诱奸理论。
Psychoanal Study Child. 1987;42:443-68. doi: 10.1080/00797308.1987.11823500.
5
[Some comments on Freud's repudiation of the seduction theory].
Psyche (Stuttg). 1988 Feb;42(2):97-131.
6
Freud's letters to Fliess. From seduction to sexual biology, from psychopathology to a clinical anthropology.弗洛伊德致弗利斯的信件。从诱奸到性生物学,从精神病理学再到临床人类学。
Int J Psychoanal. 2001 Oct;82(Pt 5):861-76. doi: 10.1516/0020757011601244.
7
A further excavation of seduction, seduction trauma, and the seduction theory.
Psychoanal Study Child. 2008;63:254-69. doi: 10.1080/00797308.2008.11800806.
8
Fact and fantasy in the seduction theory: a historical review.诱惑理论中的事实与幻想:历史回顾
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1987;35(4):937-65. doi: 10.1177/000306518703500407.
9
The seduction hypothesis. Panel report.诱惑假说。小组报告。
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1988;36(3):759-71.
10
Incest, Freud's seduction theory, and borderline personality.乱伦、弗洛伊德的诱奸理论与边缘型人格障碍
J Am Acad Psychoanal. 1992 Summer;20(2):167-81. doi: 10.1521/jaap.1.1992.20.2.167.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychodynamic assessment and treatment of traumatized patients.创伤患者的心理动力学评估与治疗。
J Psychother Pract Res. 1997 Winter;7(1):35-46.