Hughes D C, DeMallie D, Blazer D G
Department of Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
Am J Psychiatry. 1993 May;150(5):728-33. doi: 10.1176/ajp.150.5.728.
The authors examined the effects of physical health and social support on 6-month outcome of a major depressive episode in 67 patients who were less than 60 years old and 46 patients who were 60 years old or older. They hypothesized that despite their higher rate of troublesome health problems, older patients would have fewer depressive symptoms at follow-up than would younger patients.
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D Scale) and a modified version of the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule were used to gather data from inpatients and outpatients treated at Duke University Medical Center during a face-to-face interview at baseline and over the telephone at 6-month follow-up. At baseline, all patients met DSM-III-R criteria for a major depressive episode. Data analyses included bivariate and multivariate procedures.
At baseline, the mean CES-D Scale scores of the two age groups were similar. As expected, the mean illness index score of the older patients was significantly higher and their mean impaired subjective social support score was slightly lower than those of the younger patients. At 6-month follow-up, the mean CES-D Scale score of the younger patients was above the depressive threshold, but the mean CES-D Scale score of the older patients was below the depressive threshold. The illness index and impaired subjective support measures were significant predictors of depressive symptoms at 6 months for the younger patients but not for the older patients.
The authors conclude that older depressed patients have a more favorable prognosis than younger depressed patients. Predictors of outcome vary by age.
作者研究了身体健康状况和社会支持对67名年龄小于60岁及46名年龄60岁及以上的重度抑郁发作患者6个月预后的影响。他们假设,尽管老年患者存在更多令人困扰的健康问题,但随访时其抑郁症状会比年轻患者更少。
采用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D量表)和美国国立精神卫生研究所诊断访谈表的修订版,在基线面对面访谈以及6个月随访时通过电话访谈,从杜克大学医学中心的住院患者和门诊患者处收集数据。基线时,所有患者均符合重度抑郁发作的DSM-III-R标准。数据分析包括双变量和多变量分析程序。
基线时,两个年龄组的CES-D量表平均得分相似。正如预期的那样,老年患者的平均疾病指数得分显著更高,其主观社会支持受损平均得分略低于年轻患者。在6个月随访时,年轻患者的CES-D量表平均得分高于抑郁阈值,而老年患者的CES-D量表平均得分低于抑郁阈值。疾病指数和主观支持受损指标是年轻患者6个月时抑郁症状的显著预测因素,但对老年患者并非如此。
作者得出结论,老年抑郁症患者的预后比年轻抑郁症患者更有利。预后的预测因素因年龄而异。