Kronmal R A, Cain K C, Ye Z, Omenn G S
Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Seattle.
Arch Intern Med. 1993 May 10;153(9):1065-73.
To evaluate the relationship between serum cholesterol level and all-cause, coronary heart disease (CHD), and non-CHD mortality as a function of age.
The data source was the biennial examination data from 1948 through 1980 for the 5209 men and women enrolled in the Framingham Heart Study. Age-specific analyses by the Cox proportional hazards regression model were performed of survival subsequent to ages 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 years for all subjects enrolled and alive at each of the stated ages. Complementary models were studied that used high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or total cholesterol level as predictors of survival subsequent to the examination at which lipoprotein subfractions were determined (1968) through 1973).
The relationship between total cholesterol level and all-cause mortality was positive (ie, higher cholesterol level associated with higher mortality) at age 40 years, negative at age 80 years, and negligible at ages 50 to 70 years. The relationship with CHD mortality was significantly positive at ages 40, 50, and 60 years but attenuated with age until the relationship was positive, but not significant, at age 70 years and negative, but not significant, at age 80 years. Results for the relationship between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality help explain these findings. Non-CHD mortality was significantly negatively related to cholesterol level for ages 50 years and above. The negative results in the oldest age group for all-cause and CHD morality appeared to be due to a negative relationship with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels rather than the protective effect of high high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Similar results from several modified analyses make low cholesterol level due to severe illness an unlikely explanation for our results.
Physicians should be cautious about initiating cholesterol-lowering treatment in men and women above 65 to 70 years of age. Only randomized clinical trials in older people can settle the debate over the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of lipid-lowering interventions for reducing mortality and morbidity in this population.
评估血清胆固醇水平与全因死亡率、冠心病(CHD)死亡率以及非冠心病死亡率之间随年龄变化的关系。
数据来源为1948年至1980年参加弗雷明汉心脏研究的5209名男性和女性的两年一次检查数据。对所有在40、50、60、70和80岁时登记且存活的受试者,采用Cox比例风险回归模型进行年龄特异性生存分析。研究了补充模型,这些模型使用高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇或总胆固醇水平作为1968年至1973年确定脂蛋白亚组分检查后生存的预测指标。
总胆固醇水平与全因死亡率的关系在40岁时为正(即胆固醇水平越高,死亡率越高),80岁时为负,50至70岁时可忽略不计。与冠心病死亡率的关系在40、50和60岁时显著为正,但随年龄增长而减弱,直到70岁时关系为正但不显著,80岁时为负但不显著。低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇与死亡率之间关系的结果有助于解释这些发现。50岁及以上人群的非冠心病死亡率与胆固醇水平显著负相关。在最年长年龄组中,全因死亡率和冠心病死亡率的阴性结果似乎是由于与低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平呈负相关,而非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平的保护作用。多次修正分析的类似结果表明,因重病导致的低胆固醇水平不太可能解释我们的结果。
医生在对65至70岁以上的男性和女性开始降脂治疗时应谨慎。只有针对老年人的随机临床试验才能解决关于降脂干预措施降低该人群死亡率和发病率的疗效及成本效益的争论。