Bacharach-Buhles M, el Gammal S, Altmeyer P
Dermatologische Klinik, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
Hautarzt. 1993 Apr;44(4):221-4.
A case report on the rare entity of "true" Andrews bacterid and a review of the literature are used to illustrate clinical and morphological criteria that allow discrimination between Andrews bacterid and psoriasis pustulosa palmaris et plantaris. The patient noted the eruption of sterile pustules on palms and soles for the first time in his life at the age of 73 during an attack of acute tonsillitis. He had no history of psoriasis and it was also unknown in the family history. In contrast to psoriasis pustulosa palmaris et plantaris, Andrews bacterid becomes manifest as isolated pustules with an erythematous rim, which do not destroy the ridged skin. On the rest of the integument disseminated pustules are seen but no psoriatic stigmata. Thus, apart from the criterion of coincidence with an infection and the short course, we can also differentiate between Andrews bacterid and psoriasis pustulosa palmaris et plantaris on the basis of clinical criteria.
一份关于罕见的“真性”安德鲁斯杆菌疹病例报告及文献综述,用于阐述能够区分安德鲁斯杆菌疹和掌跖脓疱性银屑病的临床及形态学标准。该患者73岁时在急性扁桃体炎发作期间首次注意到手掌和脚底出现无菌脓疱。他无银屑病病史,家族史中也未提及。与掌跖脓疱性银屑病不同,安德鲁斯杆菌疹表现为孤立的脓疱,周围有红斑边缘,不破坏有纹路的皮肤。在身体其他部位可见散在脓疱,但无银屑病体征。因此,除了与感染同时出现及病程较短这一标准外,我们还可根据临床标准区分安德鲁斯杆菌疹和掌跖脓疱性银屑病。