Suppr超能文献

用于评估疾病严重程度和合并症的杜克疾病严重程度检查表(DUSOI)。

The Duke Severity of Illness Checklist (DUSOI) for measurement of severity and comorbidity.

作者信息

Parkerson G R, Broadhead W E, Tse C K

机构信息

Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Apr;46(4):379-93. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90153-r.

Abstract

The Duke Severity of Illness Checklist (DUSOI) was evaluated on 414 primary care adult patients using data collected both by medical providers at the time of the patient visit and later by a chart auditor. Severity scores for individual diagnoses were determined by summing the ratings for four non-disease-specific parameters: symptom level, complications, prognosis without treatment, and expected response to treatment. Mean diagnosis severity scores (scale 0-100) among the 21 most prevalent diagnoses varied from a low of 13.9 for menopausal syndrome to a high of 43.0 for sprains and strains. An overall severity score was calculated by combining diagnosis severity scores and giving highest weights to the most severe diagnoses. Provider-generated overall severity scores (mean = 43.3) and auditor-generated overall severity scores (mean = 38.9) were significantly correlated (coefficient of agreement = 0.59, p < 0.0001). Diagnoses varied in their individual contribution to the overall severity score, from 8.9% for lipid disorder to 90.0% for sprains and strains. Separate comorbidity severity scores were calculated to measure the severity of all of each patient's health problems except the diagnosis under study. For example, patients with menopausal syndrome had co-existing health problems which generated a high mean comorbidity severity score of 43.2, while patients with sprains and strains had a low mean comorbidity score of 4.7. The DUSOI Checklist can be used in the clinical setting by both providers and auditors to produce quantitative severity scores (by diagnosis, overall, and for comorbidity) which are based entirely upon clinical judgment. This method should be useful in controlling for severity of illness in clinical studies and indicating the outcome of medical care in terms of reduction in severity of illness following medical interventions.

摘要

使用患者就诊时医疗服务提供者收集的数据以及后来图表审核员收集的数据,对414名成年初级保健患者进行了杜克疾病严重程度检查表(DUSOI)评估。通过对四个非疾病特异性参数的评分求和来确定个体诊断的严重程度得分:症状水平、并发症、未经治疗的预后以及预期的治疗反应。21种最常见诊断的平均诊断严重程度得分(范围0 - 100)从更年期综合征的低至13.9到扭伤和拉伤的高至43.0不等。通过合并诊断严重程度得分并对最严重的诊断赋予最高权重来计算总体严重程度得分。医疗服务提供者生成的总体严重程度得分(平均值 = 43.3)与审核员生成的总体严重程度得分(平均值 = 38.9)显著相关(一致性系数 = 0.59,p < 0.0001)。不同诊断对总体严重程度得分的个体贡献各不相同,从脂质紊乱的8.9%到扭伤和拉伤的90.0%。计算单独的合并症严重程度得分以衡量每位患者除所研究诊断外所有健康问题的严重程度。例如,患有更年期综合征的患者存在共存的健康问题,其合并症严重程度平均得分较高,为43.2,而患有扭伤和拉伤的患者合并症平均得分较低,为4.7。医疗服务提供者和审核员均可在临床环境中使用DUSOI检查表来生成完全基于临床判断的定量严重程度得分(按诊断、总体以及合并症)。这种方法在临床研究中控制疾病严重程度以及根据医疗干预后疾病严重程度的降低来表明医疗护理结果方面应该是有用的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验