• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环境声音的愉悦度-不愉悦度及评价中的性别差异

Pleasantness-unpleasantness of environmental sounds and gender difference in evaluation.

作者信息

Shimai S, Fukuda K, Terasaki M

机构信息

Department of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Fukushima Medical College, Japan.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1993 Apr;76(2):635-40. doi: 10.2466/pms.1993.76.2.635.

DOI:10.2466/pms.1993.76.2.635
PMID:8483679
Abstract

The present experiment examined emotional evaluation of 40 environmental sounds which were presented to 388 college students in a lecture room. Students were required to rate pleasantness-unpleasantness, to identify the sounds, and to rate their confidence about their identifications. Analysis showed that the pleasant sounds were natural and musical sounds and that the unpleasant sounds were sounds of a belch, of a dentist's drill, and of scratching on a blackboard. It is interesting that for pleasant sounds confidence was always high, which suggested that emotional evaluation of the environmental sounds was closely related to the confidence of observers in their identifications of the sounds. Gender differences were noted on the ratings on pleasantness-unpleasantness of environmental sounds, that is, women evaluated the pleasant sounds as more pleasant than men, and men evaluated the unpleasant sounds as not so unpleasant as did women.

摘要

本实验对40种环境声音进行了情感评估,这些声音在一个讲堂中播放给388名大学生听。要求学生对声音的愉悦程度进行评分,识别这些声音,并对自己的识别结果给出信心评分。分析表明,愉悦的声音是自然和音乐类声音,而不愉悦的声音是打嗝声、牙医钻头声和黑板擦刮声。有趣的是,对于愉悦的声音,信心评分总是很高,这表明对环境声音的情感评估与观察者对声音识别的信心密切相关。在对环境声音愉悦程度的评分上发现了性别差异,即女性认为愉悦的声音比男性更愉悦,而男性认为不愉悦的声音不像女性认为的那么不愉悦。

相似文献

1
Pleasantness-unpleasantness of environmental sounds and gender difference in evaluation.环境声音的愉悦度-不愉悦度及评价中的性别差异
Percept Mot Skills. 1993 Apr;76(2):635-40. doi: 10.2466/pms.1993.76.2.635.
2
Emotion and identification of environmental sounds and electroencephalographic activity.情绪与环境声音识别及脑电图活动
Fukushima J Med Sci. 1992 Jun;38(1):43-56.
3
Auditory-olfactory integration: congruent or pleasant sounds amplify odor pleasantness.听觉-嗅觉整合:一致或令人愉悦的声音会增强气味的愉悦感。
Chem Senses. 2011 Mar;36(3):301-9. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjq129. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
4
Mapping unpleasantness of sounds to their auditory representation.将声音的不悦感映射到其听觉表征上。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Dec;124(6):3810-7. doi: 10.1121/1.3006380.
5
Adaptive sex differences in auditory motion perception: looming sounds are special.听觉运动感知中的适应性性别差异:逼近的声音很特殊。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Feb;35(1):225-34. doi: 10.1037/a0013159.
6
Individual differences in preference for environmental sounds.对环境声音偏好的个体差异。
Percept Mot Skills. 1993 Feb;76(1):279-84. doi: 10.2466/pms.1993.76.1.279.
7
Differential alpha coherence hemispheric patterns in men and women during pleasant and unpleasant musical emotions.男性和女性在感受愉悦和不愉悦音乐情绪时的半球间α波相干差异模式。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Jan;71(1):43-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.07.007. Epub 2008 Jul 23.
8
Crossmodal transfer of arousal, but not pleasantness, from the musical to the visual domain.从音乐域到视觉域的唤醒的跨模态转移,但不是愉悦感。
Emotion. 2012 Jun;12(3):618-31. doi: 10.1037/a0025020. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
9
Gender differences when touching something gross: unpleasant? No. Disgusting? Yes!触碰恶心东西时的性别差异:令人不悦?不。令人厌恶?是!
J Gen Psychol. 2013 Apr-Jun;140(2):144-57. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2013.781989.
10
Identification of Everyday Sounds Affects Their Pleasantness.对日常声音的识别会影响其愉悦感。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 8;13:894034. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894034. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
A Mathematical Approach to Correlating Objective Spectro-Temporal Features of Non-linguistic Sounds With Their Subjective Perceptions in Humans.一种将非语言声音的客观光谱-时间特征与其在人类中的主观感知相关联的数学方法。
Front Neurosci. 2019 Jul 31;13:794. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00794. eCollection 2019.