Simoila R
Hoitotiede. 1993;5(1):21-30.
The purpose of this paper is to describe and evaluate theoretical principles, possibilities and limits of the qualitative research method called phenomenography. The article is based on a literature review. Phenomenography is a research methodology initiated by Ference Marton and his research group in Sweden in the 1970s. Unlike phenomenology, phenomenography is not a philosophical school. It is a pragmatic method for doing qualitative research. In phenomenography, the aim of research is to describe the qualitatively different ways in which people perceive the world around them (the second-order perspective). The most common method of data collection is thematic interviewing. The results are categories of description representing the different conceptions of a phenomenon found among a certain population. Phenomenography is a useful method for qualitative analyses. However, it has also been criticized for a static view of human thought--a criticism that points toward the risks of relying on a single method in qualitative research.
本文旨在描述和评估一种名为现象图析法的定性研究方法的理论原则、可能性和局限性。本文基于文献综述。现象图析法是20世纪70年代由瑞典的费伦茨·马顿及其研究团队开创的一种研究方法。与现象学不同,现象图析法不是一个哲学流派。它是一种进行定性研究的实用方法。在现象图析法中,研究的目的是描述人们感知周围世界的质的不同方式(二阶视角)。最常见的数据收集方法是主题访谈。结果是描述类别,代表在特定人群中发现的对某一现象的不同概念。现象图析法是定性分析的一种有用方法。然而,它也因对人类思维的静态观点而受到批评——这种批评指出了在定性研究中依赖单一方法的风险。