Donohue D, Garcia-Godoy F, King D L, Barnwell G M
Predoctoral Division, Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas.
ASDC J Dent Child. 1993 Mar-Apr;60(2):104-6.
The authors consider mandibular infiltration as a possible alternative to mandibular block anesthesia in young children. The study sample comprised eighteen children ages six to nine years old who required bilateral identical treatment on primary mandibular molars. A random number table was used to determine which side of the mouth was to receive the block or the infiltration technique and a coin toss determined which would be administered first: A short 27 gauge needle was used to inject a 2 percent lidocaine solution with 1:100,000 epinephrine, in both techniques. The paired t-test indicated no significant difference between the two techniques for any of the factors evaluated.
作者认为在下颌浸润麻醉可能是幼儿下颌阻滞麻醉的一种替代方法。研究样本包括18名6至9岁的儿童，他们需要对双侧乳下颌磨牙进行相同的治疗。使用随机数字表确定口腔的哪一侧接受阻滞或浸润技术，通过抛硬币决定先采用哪种技术：在两种技术中均使用短的27号针头注射含1:100,000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因溶液。配对t检验表明，在评估的任何因素上，两种技术之间均无显著差异。
