• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口吃者与非口吃者在短期回忆和识别表现上的差异。

Differences between stutterers' and nonstutterers' short-term recall and recognition performance.

作者信息

Bosshardt H G

机构信息

Fakultät für Psychologie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Apr;36(2):286-93. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3602.286.

DOI:10.1044/jshr.3602.286
PMID:8487521
Abstract

Longer rehearsal times presumably reduce the efficiency of rehearsal and, hence, of short-term recall. The present experiment examined the question as to whether the slower subvocalization rate of people who stutter is correlated with inferior short-term serial recall and recognition performance. Rate of overt articulation was taken as a measure of rehearsal time. Lists of four nonlexical CVC syllables were presented for short-term serial recall and for short-term recognition. Nineteen adults who stutter and 30 nonstutterers participated in the experiment. In the serial reproduction task the subjects who stuttered reproduced significantly fewer items correctly than did nonstutterers. Recognition performance was measured by nonparametric measures of sensitivity and bias as defined in signal detection theory. The stuttering subjects had a significantly lower sensitivity resulting primarily from a higher false alarm rate. Rate of overt articulation was significantly related to one measure of short-term recall but not to the sensitivity of recognition. These results were interpreted as suggesting that people who stutter have slower phonological encoding and rehearsal times, that they make less use of nonphonological forms of coding than do nonstutterers, and that within their phonological system, activation more easily spills over to similar items.

摘要

更长的复述时间大概会降低复述效率,进而降低短期记忆的效率。本实验探讨了口吃者较慢的默读速率是否与较差的短期序列回忆及识别表现相关这一问题。清晰发音的速率被用作复述时间的衡量指标。呈现由四个非词汇性辅音-元音-辅音音节组成的列表,用于短期序列回忆和短期识别。19名成年口吃者和30名非口吃者参与了该实验。在序列再现任务中,口吃的受试者正确再现的项目明显少于非口吃者。识别表现通过信号检测理论中定义的敏感性和偏差的非参数测量来衡量。口吃受试者的敏感性显著较低,主要是由于误报率较高。清晰发音的速率与一项短期回忆指标显著相关,但与识别的敏感性无关。这些结果被解释为表明口吃者的语音编码和复述时间较慢,他们比非口吃者更少使用非语音形式的编码,并且在他们的语音系统中,激活更容易扩散到相似的项目上。

相似文献

1
Differences between stutterers' and nonstutterers' short-term recall and recognition performance.口吃者与非口吃者在短期回忆和识别表现上的差异。
J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Apr;36(2):286-93. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3602.286.
2
Subvocalization and reading rate differences between stuttering and nonstuttering children and adults.口吃儿童和成人与非口吃儿童和成人之间的默读和阅读速度差异。
J Speech Hear Res. 1990 Dec;33(4):776-85. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3304.776.
3
A comparison of stutterers' and nonstutterers' affective, cognitive, and behavioral self-reports.口吃者与非口吃者情感、认知及行为自我报告的比较。
J Speech Hear Res. 1988 Sep;31(3):377-85. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3103.377.
4
The effect of syntactic structure upon speech initiation times of stuttering and nonstuttering speakers.句法结构对口吃者和非口吃者言语起始时间的影响。
J Fluency Disord. 2003 Spring;28(1):17-35. doi: 10.1016/s0094-730x(03)00003-2.
5
Analysis of stutterers' voice onset times and fundamental frequency contours during fluency.流畅期口吃者的语音起始时间和基频轮廓分析。
J Speech Hear Res. 1984 Jun;27(2):219-25. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2702.219.
6
Acknowledgment and severity of stuttering as factors influencing nonstutterers' perceptions of stutterers.
J Speech Hear Disord. 1990 Feb;55(1):75-81. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5501.75.
7
Speaking fundamental frequency characteristics of stutterers and nonstutterers.
J Commun Disord. 1982 Jan;15(1):21-9. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(82)90041-7.
8
Acoustic measures of stutterers' and nonstutterers' fluency in two speech contexts.口吃者和非口吃者在两种言语情境下流畅性的声学测量。
J Speech Hear Res. 1986 Sep;29(3):325-31. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2903.325.
9
Preparation time and response complexity effects on stutterers' and nonstutterers' acoustic LRT.
J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Feb;34(1):49-59. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3401.49.
10
Shadowed and simple reaction times in stutterers and nonstutterers.口吃者和非口吃者的隐蔽反应时间与简单反应时间
J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Oct;86(4):1277-84. doi: 10.1121/1.398742.

引用本文的文献

1
Working memory capacity and rumination in adults who stutter.口吃成年人的工作记忆容量与沉思
J Fluency Disord. 2025 Jun;84:106119. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2025.106119. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
2
Adults Who Stutter Show Diminished Word Fluency, Regardless of Mode.口吃成年人无论采用何种模式,言语流畅性均降低。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Mar 8;65(3):906-922. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00344. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
3
The Effects of Syntactic Complexity and Sentence Length on the Speech Motor Control of School-Age Children Who Stutter.
句法复杂性和句子长度对口吃学龄儿童言语运动控制的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Sep 19;61(9):2157-2167. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-17-0435.
4
Nonword repetition in adults who stutter: The effects of stimuli stress and auditory-orthographic cues.口吃成年人的非词重复:刺激压力和听觉-正字法线索的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 29;12(11):e0188111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188111. eCollection 2017.
5
Neural Indices of Semantic Processing in Early Childhood Distinguish Eventual Stuttering Persistence and Recovery.幼儿期语义加工的神经指标可区分口吃最终的持续和恢复情况。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Nov 9;60(11):3118-3134. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-17-0081.
6
From Grapheme to Phonological Output: Performance of Adults Who Stutter on a Word Jumble Task.从字素到语音输出:口吃成年人在单词乱序任务中的表现。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 10;11(3):e0151107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151107. eCollection 2016.
7
Nonword repetition skills in young children who do and do not stutter.患有和未患口吃的幼儿的非词重复技能。
J Fluency Disord. 2006;31(3):177-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2006.05.001. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
8
Sentence-structure priming in young children who do and do not stutter.口吃和不口吃幼儿的句子结构启动效应
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Jun;47(3):552-71. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/043).
9
Spontaneous imitation of fundamental frequency and speech rate by nonstutterers and stutterers.非口吃者和口吃者对基频和语速的自发模仿。
J Psycholinguist Res. 1997 Jul;26(4):425-48. doi: 10.1023/a:1025030120016.